Makemigrations hooks for third-party apps?

sion about this previously? I haven't found any. Thanks Craig de Stigter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: Why not Single Table Inheritance?

could decide to break at any time. But it's a better solution to certain problems than MTI is, and it doesn't deserve the bashing that some people seem to give it. Use the right tool for the job. If that's STI then use STI :) Craig de Stigter On Saturday, 7 June 2014 06:05:29 UTC+12, Aymeric Au

Re: Why not Single Table Inheritance?

et/22690>. I'd love to see better support for this in Django core. Regards Craig de Stigter On Thursday, 22 May 2014 21:02:48 UTC+12, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > > On 05/22/2014 11:13 AM, Shai Berger wrote: > >> Any thoughts on this idea? > >> > > Instinct

Re: memory leak in django 1.5

Just confirming that this fixed the memory leak problem for us. Thanks again :) On Friday, March 22, 2013 3:07:02 PM UTC+13, Craig de Stigter wrote: > > Karen Tracey saves the day! > > Thanks so much, seems likely that's it :) > > Craig de Stigter > > On Friday, March 22

Re: memory leak in django 1.5

Karen Tracey saves the day! Thanks so much, seems likely that's it :) Craig de Stigter On Friday, March 22, 2013 2:25:04 PM UTC+13, Karen Tracey wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Craig de Stigter > <crai...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi everyone >> &g

memory leak in django 1.5

he bug on a dev server, and I'm not comfortable with doing `git bisect` on our production box ;) I've tried using Dozer to track down the leak but it appears to cause apache to segfault with annoying regularity before finding anything of consequence. Any tips welcome Thanks Craig de Stigter -

Re: Single table inheritance - working implementation

ter/LICENSE.txt> to the repo to clear up any confusion. Would other devs be interested in adding something like django-typed-models to Django core? What kinds of changes would make that more likely? Cheers Craig de Stigter On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Krzysztof Jurewicz < krzysz

Incorrect serialization for 3d GEOSGeometry

reads those posts, as I haven't got a response in 10 days. Thanks Craig de Stigter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-developers/-/s4smW

Re: type-field model inheritance

Since multi-table-inheritance is the only kind of inheritance (apart from abstract/proxy) supported by Django's ORM, I don't know what other type of inheritance django_polymorphic would be referring to... As per my original post, I want to store everything in one table (all subclasses have

Re: type-field model inheritance

Hi guys Thanks for pointing those out. I knew I couldn't have been the first to want this. I guess I just didn't know the right words to search for here. It looks like django_polymorphic does what I want. I'm not yet sure why it says it takes one query per type of model in a queryset. Unless

Re: type-field model inheritance

I realise everyone's been busy with getting 1.3 ready, but doesn't anyone have thoughts on this? It's been two weeks ... Thanks Craig On Thursday, February 17, 2011 11:08:57 PM UTC+13, Craig de Stigter wrote: > > Hi folks > > Ever since Django started supporting various ty

type-field model inheritance

ly that you more experienced gurus could illuminate? Thanks in advance Craig de Stigter Maintainer of django-mptt and full time dev at koordinates.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, sen