Re: Reshaping the "Contributing to Django" documentation

On May 21, 2:15 am, "Jonas H." wrote: > > "[...] try and duplicate it. If you can duplicate it [...]" > > I'd stick with "reproduce" here because "duplicate" may be confused with > "duplicate tickets". Yes that's a good point. I fixed that in the latest patch. Thanks! -- You

Re: Reshaping the "Contributing to Django" documentation

On May 21, 1:33 am, Waylan Limberg wrote: > One nitpick thought. I expect that people reporting bugs will go to > the "bugs-and-features" page, which is fine. However, as is often the > case, when their ticket is marked "accepted" (or some other triage > stage) they often get

Re: Reshaping the "Contributing to Django" documentation

"[...] try and duplicate it. If you can duplicate it [...]" I'd stick with "reproduce" here because "duplicate" may be confused with "duplicate tickets". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email

Re: Reshaping the "Contributing to Django" documentation

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Julien Phalip wrote: > Hi there, > > I've been working on reshaping the documentation about contributing to > Django, in particular the rather dense historical page [1] and the > excellent recently added how-to guide [2]. This documentation has

Reshaping the "Contributing to Django" documentation

Hi there, I've been working on reshaping the documentation about contributing to Django, in particular the rather dense historical page [1] and the excellent recently added how-to guide [2]. This documentation has sort of grown organically over the years and has become a bit difficult to read, so