Re: Upgrading Trac

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: >>> >>> As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in

Re: Upgrading Trac

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Mike Axiak wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> So, if we were to integrate a code review tool, it would only be to >> support case 3. I don't have any concrete numbers to back me up,

Re: Upgrading Trac

Is it worth upgrading to the 0.11.X branch with Trac 0.12 scheduled to be out the door within a couple weeks? On the one hand, a brand new Trac release would be more likely to contain bugs than a bugfix branch that's now on it's 7th revision. The configurable workflows and per-user permissions

Re: Upgrading Trac

On Apr 30, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > Does anyone have crib notes on what upgrading from (presumed) 0.10.4 > to 0.11.7 would buy us? If not, I can go read changelogs. > > Separate from that, I'd like to open discussion on what it would take > to do the upgrade. > > Who has access

Re: Upgrading Trac

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > So, if we were to integrate a code review tool, it would only be to > support case 3. I don't have any concrete numbers to back me up, but > my gut feeling is that case 3 isn't a time sink for me. There is an

Re: Upgrading Trac

On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in review board? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/ ... 5) The patch is missing

Re: Upgrading Trac

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in review board? > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/ I'm not sure. Like Alex, I've never used reviewboard itself. I have used codereview.appspot to review some patches

Re: Upgrading Trac

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > Separate from that, I'd like to open discussion on what it would take > to do the upgrade. To the best of my knowledge, the only things standing in the way of a Trac upgrade are: * Enthusiasm * Time The available

Re: Upgrading Trac

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in review board? > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/ > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: >> Does anyone have crib notes on what

Re: Upgrading Trac

As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in review board? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/ On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: > Does anyone have crib notes on what upgrading from (presumed) 0.10.4 > to 0.11.7 would buy us?  If not, I can go read

Upgrading Trac

Does anyone have crib notes on what upgrading from (presumed) 0.10.4 to 0.11.7 would buy us? If not, I can go read changelogs. Separate from that, I'd like to open discussion on what it would take to do the upgrade. Who has access to the server? What do I need to do to convince to let me

Re: Upgrading Trac?

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Julien Phalip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know that this is likely to be a tricky/boring task and that it is > probably low-priority since we're on the way to 1.1, but I thought at > least I'd ask: Is there any plan in the short/mid term to upgrade > Trac?

Upgrading Trac?

I know that this is likely to be a tricky/boring task and that it is probably low-priority since we're on the way to 1.1, but I thought at least I'd ask: Is there any plan in the short/mid term to upgrade Trac? My personal itch is that the current version (0.10.4) doesn't allow email