I'm wondering if we can open a quick discussion on the `formfield_callback`
method
of django ModelForms..
The basic issue boils down to the fact that we have an undocumented (and
thus unsupported) method on ModelForm that would benefit greatly from a
small change in behavior and an official
This is a group for discussing development of the framework. Please post
your support questions to django-users.
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 7:57:24 AM UTC+1, abdul wrote:
>
> I have to commit files from request.FILES to svn repository usiong pysvn
> but when i try like this
>
> import pysvn
Hi everyone!
I'm Ola, one of the main organizers of upcoming DjangoCon Europe
conference. I just wanted to let you know that we're starting to sell
regular tickets to the conference today at 4pm CET prompt! Tickets are
available here: http://tickets.djangocon.eu/
We have also recently
Hi Shai,
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:18:14 AM UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote:
>
> > No, since the Oracle tests are somewhat slow we decided to just test one
> > Python for now. I will try to see if Python 2 makes a difference, didn't
> > yet think of it.
> >
>
> Cool.
>
They do work on
I just wanted to say that the list of talks & speakers is the best I've
seen to date. I really wish I could go see it, but unfortunately Warsaw is
too far for me.
I wonder if these will ever be made available online for a fee, even if
months after the conference. For a hobbyist developer like me,
I looked into this today with 1.5 hitting and working on a project and this
seemed relevant.
On Monday, 2 May 2011 19:22:53 UTC+2, Carl Meyer wrote:
> 1. A specification of the minimal useful interface for a User (perhaps
>
> in the form of an abstract base model?)
>
A User should not require
Hi all,
Why isn't Pillow the recommended Django image library yet? PIL has
been unmaintained for almost 3 years and has a number of annoying bugs
(e.g. fails to open some valid JPEG files, maybe has some security
issues as well). Pillow, on the other hand, is a backwards-compatible
On 27-02-13 21:21, Andre Terra wrote:
I wonder if these will ever be made available online for a fee, even if
months after the conference. For a hobbyist developer like me, coughing
up a few thousand dollars for the tickets, registration and hotel is
just impossible, but I would be glad to pay
On Wednesday 27 February 2013, poswald wrote:
> I'm wondering if we can open a quick discussion on the `formfield_callback`
> method of django ModelForms..
>
> The basic issue boils down to the fact that we have an undocumented (and
> thus unsupported) method on ModelForm that would benefit
On 27 févr. 2013, at 21:40, Marijonas Petrauskas wrote:
> Why isn't Pillow the recommended Django image library yet? PIL has
> been unmaintained for almost 3 years and has a number of annoying bugs
> (e.g. fails to open some valid JPEG files, maybe has some security
> issues
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Alper Çuğun wrote:
>
> I looked into this today with 1.5 hitting and working on a project and
> this seemed relevant.
>
> On Monday, 2 May 2011 19:22:53 UTC+2, Carl Meyer wrote:
>
>> 1. A specification of the minimal useful interface for a User
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
>
> On 27 févr. 2013, at 21:40, Marijonas Petrauskas wrote:
>
> > Why isn't Pillow the recommended Django image library yet? PIL has
> > been unmaintained for almost 3 years and has a
Hi all,
We struggled to get a proper definition for a first() and last() method vs.
earliest() and latest() . I'd like to make one proposal. After that, I
really like your opinion on which syntax you prefer.
First, let me give you a lenghty introduction. We discussed several use
cases on this
Hi Florian,
On Wednesday 27 February 2013, Florian Apolloner wrote:
> Hi Shai,
>
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:18:14 AM UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote:
> > > No, since the Oracle tests are somewhat slow we decided to just test
> > > one Python for now. I will try to see if Python 2 makes a
On 27 févr. 2013, at 23:34, Wim Feijen wrote:
> Therefore, my proposal is, if we are going to implement the earliest and
> latest method, we should definitely rename them to: first and latest.
I believe that latest() was introduced with dates in mind, and then earliest()
Hello,
I've integrated the feedback received on my initial proposal in a new pull
request:
https://github.com/django/django/pull/733 and I think it's ready for review.
I'm just wondering if 10 minutes is a good default value for CONN_MAX_AGE.
I chose it randomly. Would "unlimited" be better?
On Thursday 28 February 2013, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> I would support renaming them to first / last through a deprecation path.
> The new aliases would be available immediately, the old ones would be
> removed in two versions.
>
+1
> And while we're there, I suggest to rely on the existing
Oopsie:
On Thursday 28 February 2013, Shai Berger wrote:
>
> Note that with this suggestion:
>
> qset.filter(a=b).first(c)
>
> is not equivalent to
>
> qset.order_by(c).filter(a=b)
>
That should have read
qset.order_by(c).first(a=b)
Shai.
--
You received this message
On 02/27/2013 05:34 PM, Wim Feijen wrote:
Hi all,
We struggled to get a proper definition for a first() and last()
method vs. earliest() and latest() . I'd like to make one proposal.
After that, I really like your opinion on which syntax you prefer.
First, let me give you a lenghty
19 matches
Mail list logo