Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-23 Thread Stephen Kelly
Michael Feingold wrote: > > Thank you for the pointers. You have some pretty interesting test > cases in your project. Thanks. Actually most of the credit goes to the django developers, because most of my tests are just ported versions of the django tests. > We also have quiet a few test

Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-23 Thread Michael Feingold
Thank you for the pointers. You have some pretty interesting test cases in your project. We also have quiet a few test cases in our unit tests have a peek if you are interested. As to the ticket - this is an interesting one. The scenario it refers to seems pretty clear to me I agree with Karen's

Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-23 Thread Stephen Kelly
Michael Feingold wrote: > On Sep 23, 2:54 am, Pablo Escobar > wrote: >> 1. Django is Open Source. It is not a problem to find the parsing >> algorithm >> > Of course it is And we did go through the code. But reverse > engineering can show you what happens, not what the

Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-23 Thread Michael Feingold
On Sep 23, 2:54 am, Pablo Escobar wrote: > 1. Django is Open Source. It is not a problem to find the parsing > algorithm > Of course it is And we did go through the code. But reverse engineering can show you what happens, not what the intention was

Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-23 Thread Pablo Escobar
1. Django is Open Source. It is not a problem to find the parsing algorithm PS Anyway. I don't see any advantages of django's templates comparing with ASP.NET MVC Views --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-22 Thread Doug Blank
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Michael Feingold wrote: > > That's what we started with. It did not work out. While IronPython (as > well as some other implementations of Python) are available in .Net, > integrating an app written in Python with anything else written in any

Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-22 Thread Michael Feingold
That's what we started with. It did not work out. While IronPython (as well as some other implementations of Python) are available in .Net, integrating an app written in Python with anything else written in any other .Net language proved to be a big challenge. You can run a Python app on .Net

Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-22 Thread Dj Gilcrease
I dont know all that much about .Net but isnt the point of it that all the .Net languages can be used together? eg using C#.Net components in a VB.Net app and such. So why not just use the django template language as is via IronPython instead of trying to port it to another language?

Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-22 Thread Michael Feingold
Well, we liked the language, and it is too late anyway - it is implemented On Sep 22, 12:18 pm, Anton Bessonov wrote: > Hello, > > if you need template engine only, then make more sence to port pure > template engine such as jinja2. IMHO. > > Michael Feingold schrieb: > >

Re: NDjango - .Net port of Django template langauage

2009-09-22 Thread Anton Bessonov
Hello, if you need template engine only, then make more sence to port pure template engine such as jinja2. IMHO. Michael Feingold schrieb: > I am working on NDjango project. NDjango is a port of Django template > language to .Net. It is an open source project. If you are curious you > can get