On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Bill Freeman wrote:
> Its not clear to me whether unique_together will make there be an index, so
> it might be slow.
unique_together implies a multi part index - it's the only way it
could be reasonably implemented.
Cheers
Tom
--
You received this message be
ce for a situation i've got.
>>
>> I'm working on a new project and after designing my ERD I know i need a
>> few tables to have multiple primary keys and one table with triple primary
>> keys.
>>
>> after reading about the subject online i found out tha
ny 3rd party Django apps as well.
>
> On Monday, July 29, 2013 11:39:20 AM UTC-4, Guy Tamir wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i'm fairly new to Django and i have a question regarding the best
>> practice for a situation i've got.
>>
>> I'm wo
ituation i've got.
>
> I'm working on a new project and after designing my ERD I know i need a
> few tables to have multiple primary keys and one table with triple primary
> keys.
>
> after reading about the subject online i found out that Django does not
> s
Hi all,
i'm fairly new to Django and i have a question regarding the best practice
for a situation i've got.
I'm working on a new project and after designing my ERD I know i need a few
tables to have multiple primary keys and one table with triple primary keys.
after reading ab
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:21 PM, ojayred wrote:
> Hello Users,
>
> I am new to using Django and so far, I like it. I have installed
> Django and want to use it with a pre-existing database. Several tables
> have multiple primary keys. How do I create the multiple primary keys
&g
Hello Users,
I am new to using Django and so far, I like it. I have installed
Django and want to use it with a pre-existing database. Several tables
have multiple primary keys. How do I create the multiple primary keys
in the model? I did use the inspectdb command to help me create the
model
retty nice) URL scheme used today.
So I'd say: yes there's reason to worry about *how* to support
multiple primary keys (including arbitrary string keys), but
there's no reason what-so-ever not to implement it. The multiple
primary key feature would open up for loads of legacy databas
Lars, have you made any progress on this? I agree that only the
numeric
types are interesting as multiple keys, so worrying about URL
encoding
is pointless (i.e., there's no reason to worry about supporting
multiple
arbitrary-string keys).
I'm trying to convince a team to use Django for new deve
have to deal with the admin URLs at all.
>
> - it does not deal with creating databases or database introspection.
>
> For a model with multiple primary keys, add an Meta class attribute
> `has_composite_primary_key_key=True`. Here's an example model with
> multiple prima
On 8/14/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Periodically, I wonder if it's worth implementing this anyway, just for
> fun, and then saying if you have multiple primary keys, you can't use
> those models in the admin.
No need to ban _all_ multiple p
the project, so you have to maintain it on
your own
- it doesn't try to work for the admin or for newforms (but made be working
for it), so I didn't have to deal with the admin URLs at all.
- it does not deal with creating databases or database introspection.
For a model with multiple
t;>> you have multiple column primary keys, this isn't so easy to do. To
>>>> date, every proposed syntax for URL spaces supporting multiple primary
>>>> keys has either been syntactically ambiguous (e.g.,
>>>> /path/to/object/42,37 - which works unl
t so easy to do. To
> >> date, every proposed syntax for URL spaces supporting multiple primary
> >> keys has either been syntactically ambiguous (e.g.,
> >> /path/to/object/42,37 - which works unless the primary key has a comma
> >> in it), or very inelegant (/path
path/to/object/42/ -> edit object 42
>>
>> This works fine if you have a single column primary key; however, if
>> you have multiple column primary keys, this isn't so easy to do. To
>> date, every proposed syntax for URL spaces supporting multiple primary
>> ke
works fine if you have a single column primary key; however, if
> you have multiple column primary keys, this isn't so easy to do. To
> date, every proposed syntax for URL spaces supporting multiple primary
> keys has either been syntactically ambiguous (e.g.,
> /path/to/object/42,37 -
ication and generic
views. Both of these features rely upon the ability to install URLs
like:
/path/to/object/42/ -> edit object 42
This works fine if you have a single column primary key; however, if
you have multiple column primary keys, this isn't so easy to do. To
date, every proposed sy
Hi all,
first of all: django rocks! I'm a database application developer
and not a web developer. I'm not even fluent in python. Despite
that, the django framework has made it possible for me to develop
web based database applications with relative ease. And, I can
use the model and the database
On 10/19/06, flynnguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, but don't I still need to specify a primary key in django?
Yes you do, but you can nominate any field in your model as the
primary key - you don't have to use 'id'. If you add a
primary_key=True argument to the definition of any field, it
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> However, as suggested in the ticket, you can work around the problem
> by hand writing the schema yourself (or, in your case, inheriting some
> schema from elsewhere), then writing a Django model that replicates
> everything in your schema _except_ the mutliple primary
ke
> the ability to use the admin console. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Django doesn't currently have support for multiple primary keys, and
as far as I know, nobody is really looking at the problem.
However, as suggested in the ticket, you can work around the problem
by hand writ
I'm trying to inspect my db for mythtv. I'm running into issues with
the inspect command because of the 0 date issue, not a problem, I'm
just creating the models I need by hand. The issue I am currently
running into is the recorded table has two primary keys (chanid and
starttime).
In searching I
22 matches
Mail list logo
