On Jun 11, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> But I've found a workable solution (note the subject of
> my reply), so I can stay subscribed. I just know now not to ever ask
> for anything to be changed. ;-)
You previously mentioned that one-key filtering only works with
subject, body,
> As I said abive, when I've done that in the past I never find the time
> to dig into all my folders. If I'm going to monitor a list, it needs
> to go through my inbox and have me take a manual action to move it to
> a folder.
I think this is the root of your request. I doubt you will find
Mike Schinkel wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > Outlook has had rule-based sorting into other mailboxes for a
> > while, so I would have thought it was possible to use that.
>
> It does have that. And I tried that for a while, but found it to be
> "out-of-sight, out-of-mind." It's worse
You should install this plugin for Firefox. It'll help you with your
myriad GMail accounts:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1320
Of course it may be that you only use IE, so you may need to join that
project's mailing list and request them to rewrite it to support your
browser
Michael,
I'd be happy to send you a gmail invite. It's really a good choice
when subscribing to newsgroups like these.
Let me know.
Michael
On 6/10/07, Nimrod A. Abing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Prior to switching to GMail exclusively, I used to use Outlook or
> Outlook
Hello,
Prior to switching to GMail exclusively, I used to use Outlook or
Outlook Express. I had the same problem that you have now, so I
understand where you're coming from. I used to use a modified
spambayes filter that would modify the Subject field and add a prefix
to it (e.g., SPAM,
Chris Moffitt wrote:
> Not to pile on but if you'd like a google mail account for list
> purposes,
that's always an option. It has a very nice way of allowing you to tag
messages and file them accordingly. You can also use pop if you want
to consolidate with your other mail boxes. Procmail is
Simon Drabble write
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
> > On 10-Jun-07, at 7:33 AM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> >> Does anyone know of a free service (or software) that I
> could proxy
> >> through that would let me add a subject header? Given that it
> >> appears to be a non-negotiable
On 10-Jun-07, at 7:33 AM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> Does anyone know of a free service (or software) that I could proxy
> through
> that would let me add a subject header? Given that it appears to be a
> non-negotiable on the list, that's about the only potential
> solution left
> that I can
t: Re: Including [django-users] in subject line?
-Chris
On 6/9/07, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote;
> > > Outlook has had rule-bas
Ramiro Morales wrote:
> On 6/9/07, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm curious how many people of the 5000+ would prefer no ID in subject? >
>> Is it a majority, or just a very vocal minority?
>>
>
> /me raise hand.
>
> Come on, even GMail has a way to create a filter
> that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> http://www.robbyonrails.com/articles/2006/04/13/canada-on-rail
> s-day-1-part-1
>
> Why does this keep seeming more and more accurate every day
You mean the part about "This fairly dismissive treatment of people's
legitimate concerns...?"
--
-Mike Schinkel
James Bennett wrote:
> On 6/9/07, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ironic. I was asking for a method that would help me make the list
> > more managable, and have been told "no." Ironic because it
> will likely
> > cause me to leave before I can really learn more about Django, my
On 6/9/07, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm curious how many people of the 5000+ would prefer no ID in subject? > Is
> it a majority, or just a very vocal minority?
>
/me raise hand.
Come on, even GMail has a way to create a filter
that tags a message according to some pattern
Not to pile on but if you'd like a google mail account for list purposes,
that's always an option. It has a very nice way of allowing you to tag
messages and file them accordingly. You can also use pop if you want to
consolidate with your other mail boxes. Procmail is also a handy option..
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:23:15PM -0400, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote;
> > > > Outlook has had rule-based sorting into other mailboxes for a while,
> > > > so I would have thought it was possible to use that.
> > >
> > > It does have that. And I tried that for a while,
On 6/9/07, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ironic. I was asking for a method that would help me make the list more
> managable, and have been told "no." Ironic because it will likely cause me
> to leave before I can really learn more about Django, my reason for wanting
> to get on the
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 19:53 -0400, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > Outlook has had rule-based sorting into other mailboxes for a
> > while, so I would have thought it was possible to use that.
>
> It does have that. And I tried that for a while, but found it to be
>
James Bennett wrote:
> I'm sorry if it sounded rude; again, I wasn't trying to pick
> on you, but it's also hard to articulate this without
> sounding like an asshole. It's kind of a lose-lose situation.
And I apologize for reacting badly. No harm, no foul.
> And this is really great for
On 6/9/07, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the warm welcome to a new list member.
I'm sorry if it sounded rude; again, I wasn't trying to pick on you,
but it's also hard to articulate this without sounding like an
asshole. It's kind of a lose-lose situation.
This list has
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Outlook has had rule-based sorting into other mailboxes for a
> while, so I would have thought it was possible to use that.
It does have that. And I tried that for a while, but found it to be
"out-of-sight, out-of-mind." It's worse than just going to the group
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 18:42 -0400, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > > Is there any chance the owners of this list could modify the
> > > configuration so that the emails contain [django-users] in
> > the subject
> > > line? It would make it so much easier to deal with the
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > Is there any chance the owners of this list could modify the
> > configuration so that the emails contain [django-users] in
> the subject
> > line? It would make it so much easier to deal with the volume of
> > email if this could be done.
>
> No. Sorry.
>
>
James Bennett wrote:
> This is more of a general plea on behalf of those of us who
> already get more email than we can reasonably read: before
> posting to this list, please remember that the archive is on
> Google Groups, and that Google is *really* good at searching;
> you may be able to
On 6/9/07, Mike Schinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any chance the owners of this list could modify the configuration
> so that the emails contain [django-users] in the subject line? It would
> make it so much easier to deal with the volume of email if this could be
> done.
I'm not
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 18:12 -0400, Mike Schinkel wrote:
> Is there any chance the owners of this list could modify the configuration
> so that the emails contain [django-users] in the subject line? It would
> make it so much easier to deal with the volume of email if this could be
> done.
No.
26 matches
Mail list logo
