I tried web2py and haven't gone back, though sometimes it is tempting
when I see so much Django work available!
On Feb 18, 7:48 am, snfctech wrote:
> If so, could you provide a bullet list of things you preferred in
> Django? Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Yes, I are
> free to choose whatever license you want for your own code, but the
> terms of the GPL mean that your own choice of license on your own
> project *may* affect whether or not I can distribute Web2py along with
> my code.
L
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:16 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> Sorry Russ,
>
> I did not say nor implied that any of the points above were
> distinctive or unique. I just tried to clarify some issues raised by
> other users here.
No problems - I'm not trying to accuse you of anything nefarious. I
just wante
On Feb 19, 2:14 pm, bruno desthuilliers
wrote:
> On 19 fév, 15:38, Wiiboy wrote:
>
> > And the explicit vs. implicit imports: Personally, I love the fact
> > that the request object is available all over the place, including
> > models, and that I don't have to do any importing.
>
> As far as I'
On 19 fév, 10:35, NoviceSortOf wrote:
(snip)
> In my opinion frameworks should be considered on a project by project
> basis
Well, if you have enough time to learn and master a dozen or more
different frameworks, that might be a sensible policy. As far as I'm
concerned, having to deal with Zo
On 19 fév, 15:38, Wiiboy wrote:
> And the explicit vs. implicit imports: Personally, I love the fact
> that the request object is available all over the place, including
> models, and that I don't have to do any importing.
As far as I'm concerned, it's a definitive No-No. The request is only
me
I'd rather stay out and limit myself to rectify incorrect statements
if any. For example I'll say the documentation is not new. It has been
there for 2 years, it's just that was not free and cost $12. It is
actually old now. It still does not describe lots of new functionality
and we are trying to
I've noticed that there have been a lot of things in common:
Web2py _didn't_ have very good docs, at least relative to Django's
(which are spectacular), but now that the Web2py book is available
online, that issue is kind of moot.
Admin -- Web2py has two different Admins, one which doesn't have a
Sorry Russ,
I did not say nor implied that any of the points above were
distinctive or unique. I just tried to clarify some issues raised by
other users here.
I was careful to only make comparison that were favorable to Django
(the admin for example). I realize I am a guest here.
I do not think
As a newbie of sorts I started by trying out both Web2Py and Django at
the same time. I found Web2Py to somehow be more elegant, and in fact
liked the coding style in the source better that what I found in
Django, or can say at least I preferred the structure and format of
the code I saw.
The docu
As a newbie of sorts I started by trying out both Web2Py and Django at
the same time.
I found Web2Py to somehow be more elegant, and in fact liked the
coding style in the
source better that what I found in Django, or can say at least I
preferred the structure
and format of the code I saw.
The docu
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Regarding licensing: I have no desire to get into a "whose license is
> better" flamewar. You writes the code, you picks the license.
The way I see it, Massimo was just addressing the point about Django
culture and permissive lic
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:37 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> I apologize for intruding and try not to be partisan. I will not list
> pros and cons since this is not the place for me to do so.
> I would just like to make clarifications about things being said:
And I would like to clarify some of your clari
I apologize for intruding and try not to be partisan. I will not list
pros and cons since this is not the place for me to do so.
I would just like to make clarifications about things being said:
1) web2py comes with a web based IDE but you do not have to use it.
You can disabled it or can even rem
@Vasil: thanks for the enumerated points.
On Feb 18, 8:47 am, snfctech wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, Wiiboy.
>
> I agree that web2py is cool and Massimo is a good guy.
>
> I'm still comparing the two frameworks and don't have a lot of
> preferences to list yet, but so far I prefer the way the on
Thanks for the reply, Wiiboy.
I agree that web2py is cool and Massimo is a good guy.
I'm still comparing the two frameworks and don't have a lot of
preferences to list yet, but so far I prefer the way the online Django
tutorial is written to the Overview/tutorial chapter of the web2py
book. I al
I've looked at it a couple of months ago. There are some great ideas behind it.
Web2Py cons:
1. The first and biggest issue at the time was that there was no
sufficient/accessible documentation available for free. The book was
only available on scribd for free which is horrible. Now the book is
av
First of all, I'd like to say that I think Web2py, and its maintainer
Massimo, are awesome. =)
I tried Web2py for a little while a couple months ago, but the biggest
issue was poor documentation -- at the time, there was almost
nothing. Now there's a whole book, online, but...
Also, it was missi
If so, could you provide a bullet list of things you preferred in
Django? Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
19 matches
Mail list logo
