Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

I have closed the subject ticket and incorporated relevant text changes in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-02, which will be published on Datatracker as soon as the chairs have a chance to do so. On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:30 PM Steven M Jones wrote: > On 5/28/21 08:43, Todd Herr wrote: > > >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

On 5/28/21 08:43, Todd Herr wrote: > > Consensus on Ticket #50 > (Remove ri= tag) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to remove > the tag and update the IANA registry to reflect its removal. I support removing the tag from the specification,

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

Editors, I sent y'all a pull request. Tim On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:35 PM Dotzero wrote: > > > On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:59 PM John Levine wrote: > >> It appears that Tim Wicinski said: >> >-=-=-=-=-=- >> > >> >All, >> > >> >This is the current text in Section 10.4 of dmarc-bis >> > >> >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:59 PM John Levine wrote: > It appears that Tim Wicinski said: > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >All, > > > >This is the current text in Section 10.4 of dmarc-bis > > > > Names of DMARC tags must be registered with IANA in this new sub- > > registry. New entries are assigned

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

It appears that Tim Wicinski said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >All, > >This is the current text in Section 10.4 of dmarc-bis > > Names of DMARC tags must be registered with IANA in this new sub- > registry. New entries are assigned only for values that have been > documented in a manner that

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

On Fri 28/May/2021 17:43:59 +0200 Todd Herr wrote: Consensus on Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to remove the tag and update the IANA registry to reflect its removal. Agree to totally eliminate ri= from

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

All, This is the current text in Section 10.4 of dmarc-bis Names of DMARC tags must be registered with IANA in this new sub- registry. New entries are assigned only for values that have been documented in a manner that satisfies the terms of Specification Required, per [RFC8126].

[dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

Greetings. Consensus on Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to remove the tag and update the IANA registry to reflect its removal. I seek consensus from the working group at large on this ticket, and request that a