...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sérgio
Figueiredo
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 5:24 PM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Multicast requirements
Hi Anthony,
Thank you for trying to progress on this matter. I mostly agree with your
analysis.
As for the question you posed
,
Pierrick
De : dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de
karag...@cs.utwente.nl
Envoyé : samedi 17 novembre 2012 13:01
À : seilj...@av.it.pt; juancarlos.zun...@interdigital.com
Cc : dmm@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [DMM] Multicast requirements
Hi all,
I also agree that the DMM
: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [DMM] Multicast requirements
Hi all,
I tend to agree with Georgious, however I still do not figure out what is the
use-case for distributed mobile multicast (other than academic considerations)?
Can someone give concrete example?
I haven’t real all messages
: Re: [DMM] Multicast requirements
Hi Juan,
I've been looked at changed flow of your proposed text but sorry now that my
comment is posted.
At first time, I couldn't make sure however, on hearing Stig's description,
it seems quite reasonable at the first step, not giving any restrictions
; Behcet Sarikaya; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Multicast requirements
In the DMM case my assumption is that the anchor points are closer to the
access routers and therefore are very likely to be in the same
administrative domain. In these cases, joining the multicast group directly
from the access
On 11/15/2012 3:17 AM, jouni korhonen wrote:
On Nov 15, 2012, at 1:03 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
I think we are reading too much into multicast and unicast should be
designed in an integrated manner.
The fact is that multicast is considered as an area of specialization,
it requires
On Nov 15, 2012, at 1:03 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
I think we are reading too much into multicast and unicast should be
designed in an integrated manner.
The fact is that multicast is considered as an area of specialization,
it requires knowledge of very different protocols than we are
Hi Behcet
|As you know, Costas has changed his view thinking wider.
I didn't change my view :) Maybe it was not so clearly explained, apologies for
that. I think that it does not harm to have a separate REQ no. 7 addressing
multicast along the lines previously mentioned in the mailing list.
Hi,
|I can tell you that in Multimob meeting in Atlanta, we have not
|discussed any requirements.
Indeed. I was at the multicast meeting in Atlanta, well, the better part of it,
and I do not recall any excitement about working on the requirements for
multicast support in DMM. On the
On Nov 13, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Konstantinos Pentikousis wrote:
Hi Juan Carlos, all,
|Requirement: DMM solutions SHOULD support multicast services. In case
|the solution does not address multicast, a justification MUST be provided
|for the omission of multicast from the solution.
I like
Hi Jouni,
Requirement: DMM solutions SHOULD support multicast services.
So here it is a should.
If a specific DMM solution does not support multicast services, an
explanation MUST be provided.
Why is it a must here?
My comment on this requirement is in mobility area, we have never had
Behcet,
On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:35 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Hi Jouni,
Requirement: DMM solutions SHOULD support multicast services.
So here it is a should.
It seems so.
If a specific DMM solution does not support multicast services, an
explanation MUST be provided.
Why is it a
Folks,
This mail is to kick off the discussion on multicast requirement(s) for the
draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-02 document. I hope we can nail down the essential
multicast requirement(s) as soon as possible.
- Jouni
___
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
jouni korhonen wrote:
Folks,
This mail is to kick off the discussion on multicast requirement(s)
for the draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-02 document. I hope we can nail
down the essential multicast requirement(s) as soon as possible.
To me, multicast in a DMM environment means joining multicast
Hi Jouni,
This discussion originated by a presentation in Multimob of a draft on
IP Multicast Use Cases and Analysis over Distributed Mobility
Management,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sfigueiredo-multimob-use-case-dmm-03.
This draft is on use cases not on requirements. The author, Seil
Of Peter
McCann
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 9:53 PM
To: Thomas C. Schmidt
Cc: Stig Venaas; Behcet Sarikaya; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Multicast requirements
In the DMM case my assumption is that the anchor points are closer to the
access routers and therefore are very likely
, please suggest it.
Regards,
Juan Carlos
-Original Message-
From: Sérgio Figueiredo [mailto:sfigueir...@av.it.pt]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 6:46 PM
To: Zuniga, Juan Carlos
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Multicast requirements
Hi Juan Carlos,
Don't get me wrong. Although
17 matches
Mail list logo
