Hi JC,
>> I challenge you to remove all MN related text (I think Wen pointed out
>> almost all of them) from the draft and say that considerations in
>> Section 7 of RFC 5213 apply.
>>
>> How about that?
>
> [JCZ] RFC 5213 does have non-normative MN-related text in multiple sections
> (beyond se
Hi Behcet,
> -Original Message-
> From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 3:39 PM
> To: Zuniga, Juan Carlos
> Cc: c...@it.uc3m.es; dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] review of draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchorin
Hi JC,
>> In your new draft draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00, you
>> already admit that D-GW is a MAG and LMA combined. Actually it is also
>> very much like HA in draft-sarikaya-dmm-dmipv6-00.
>>
>> Because of the MN in Fig.1 configures PrefA (this one is normal PMIPv6)
>> and
>>
>>
Hi Behcet,
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Behcet Sarikaya
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 12:50 PM
> To: c...@it.uc3m.es
> Cc: dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] review of draft-bernardos-dmm-distri
Hi Carlos,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
wrote:
> Hi Behcet,
>
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 11:13 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Behcet,
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 11:
Hi Behcet,
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 11:13 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> wrote:
> > Hi Behcet,
> >
> > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 11:06 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >> You say in various places in your
Hi Carlos,
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
wrote:
> Hi Behcet,
>
> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 11:06 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> You say in various places in your draft that your protocol is PMIPv6-based.
>> I wonder how it could be?
>
> More accuratel
Hi Pete,
Comments inline below...
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:38 +, Peter McCann wrote:
> Hi, Carlos,
>
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> > Hi Pete,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply. Please see inline below.
> >
> > On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 18:58 +, Peter McCann wrote:
> >> Hi, Carlos,
Hi Behcet,
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 11:06 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> You say in various places in your draft that your protocol is PMIPv6-based.
> I wonder how it could be?
More accurately, we could say that the solution is network-based. PMIPv6
is just one network-based protoco
Hi Carlos,
You say in various places in your draft that your protocol is PMIPv6-based.
I wonder how it could be?
Please see below.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
wrote:
> Hi Luowen,
>
> First of all, apologies for my late reply.
>
> Please, see inline below.
>
> On
Hi, Carlos,
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. Please see inline below.
>
> On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 18:58 +, Peter McCann wrote:
>> Hi, Carlos,
>>
>> Just a couple of response points below...
>>
>> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
>>> Hi Pete,
>>>
Hi Luowen,
First of all, apologies for my late reply.
Please, see inline below.
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 14:43 +0800, luo@zte.com.cn wrote:
>
> Hi Carlos
>
> I have reviewed your draft, and I have two questions to your draft as
> following:
Thanks for reading it.
>
> First, let's consider
Hi Pete,
Sorry for the late reply. Please see inline below.
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 18:58 +, Peter McCann wrote:
> Hi, Carlos,
>
> Just a couple of response points below...
>
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> > Hi Pete,
> >
> > Thanks for the comments. Please see some comments inline be
Hi Carlos
I have reviewed your draft, and I have two questions to your draft as
following:
First, let's consider this scenario. Initially, MN is attached to D-GW1
and has a session#1 (anchored at D-GW1). When moving to D-GW2, MN starts
another session#2 (session#1 keeps on going). As per your
Hi, Carlos,
Just a couple of response points below...
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> Thanks for the comments. Please see some comments inline below.
>
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 20:55 +, Peter McCann wrote:
>> Hi, Carlos, Juan-Carlos,
>>
>> I have read draft-bernardos-dmm-d
Hi Pete,
Thanks for the comments. Please see some comments inline below.
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 20:55 +, Peter McCann wrote:
> Hi, Carlos, Juan-Carlos,
>
> I have read draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00, and I have a few
> comments.
>
> First, I want to bring up something that I th
Hi, Carlos, Juan-Carlos,
I have read draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00, and I have a few
comments.
First, I want to bring up something that I think is common to several of
the DMM proposals, and that is sub-optimal use of the backhaul resources.
It seems that when you use an AR as an a
17 matches
Mail list logo
