-Message d'origine-
De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Behcet Sarikaya
Envoyé : mardi 22 juillet 2014 19:04
À : Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Cc : dmm@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [DMM] IETF#90 DMM agenda update
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
sgund
. Juli 2014 10:13
To: sarik...@ieee.org; Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] IETF#90 DMM agenda update
-Message d'origine-
De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Behcet Sarikaya
Envoyé : mardi 22 juillet 2014 19:04 À : Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Cc
] On Behalf Of pierrick.se...@orange.com
Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2014 10:13
To: sarik...@ieee.org; Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] IETF#90 DMM agenda update
-Message d'origine-
De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Behcet Sarikaya
Envoyé
Of
pierrick.se...@orange.com
Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2014 10:13
To: sarik...@ieee.org; Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] IETF#90 DMM agenda update
-Message d'origine-
De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Behcet Sarikaya
Envoyé : mardi 22
Behcet,
7/23/2014 5:16 PM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti:
Hi Jouni,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Jouni Korhonen jouni.nos...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
meetings and setting up small groups (or design teams) to work on the
^^^
Design teams?
Exact form
On 7/23/14 10:16 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
So my question is what guarantees that is the DT is going to produce
the right solution and why repeat the history again?
Who said that *if* a DT is formed that its output is considered special?
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/design-team.html
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Brian Haberman
br...@innovationslab.net wrote:
On 7/23/14 10:16 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
So my question is what guarantees that is the DT is going to produce
the right solution and why repeat the history again?
Who said that *if* a DT is formed that its
On 7/23/14 10:49 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Brian Haberman
br...@innovationslab.net wrote:
On 7/23/14 10:16 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
So my question is what guarantees that is the DT is going to produce
the right solution and why repeat the history again?
On 7/22/14 10:49 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
Folks,
The agenda has been slightly updated (shuffling around the slots and
arranging more time to the charter/next steps discussion). Some
presenters are affected slightly (-5 minutes). see
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/agenda/agenda-90-dmm
Hi Brian,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Brian Haberman
br...@innovationslab.net wrote:
On 7/22/14 10:49 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
Folks,
The agenda has been slightly updated (shuffling around the slots and
arranging more time to the charter/next steps discussion). Some
presenters are
Behcet,
Check some of the documents in MPLS/Routing areas.
DMM to most part is about deployment. Without bringing the deployment
aspects, documenting DMM solutions will be immature.
Sri
On 7/22/14 8:08 AM, Behcet Sarikaya sarikaya2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at
Hi Sri,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
sgund...@cisco.com wrote:
Behcet,
Check some of the documents in MPLS/Routing areas.
Sorry, I am familiar with those areas, they are not in Intarea :-).
DMM to most part is about deployment. Without bringing the
Alternatively, you capture the deployment models and then identify the
solution gaps or solutions that meet the goals ...
Sorry, I am familiar with those areas, they are not in Intarea :-).
RFC-6674; A solution driven by a deployment requirement.
Sri
On 7/22/14 9:36 AM, Behcet Sarikaya
You are talking about Gateway Initiated DS-Lite (RFC 6674).
That is a solution based on DS-Lite, i.e. a variation of DS-Lite or RFC 6333.
Again, my plea to you, please come up with your draft and let WG see
what you propose.
That is the right way to go.
Behcet
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:48
14 matches
Mail list logo
