Hi Charlie,
Success is when we see the protocols we design are deployed and used.
Whether it's over 3GPP, WiFi, or something else.
The more the merrier.
I don't think anyone is preventing use of DMM over WiFi.
Alper
On Sep 4, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Charles E. Perkins wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
Alex,
DMM is not meant to be only about a bunch of MIP-based solutions.
There are various components in DMM solution space that'd also work with
GTP-based architectures.
For example, identifying the mobility needs of flows.
Or, conveying the mobility characteristic of a prefix to the UE.
Alper
From meeting minutes:
(Jouni) "I suggest that we left the bullet as a work item and we do not have
explicit milestone
for it. we can add this milestone when we actually see that there is something
meaningful
forming for that document. "
The decision at the meeting was to leave the work item in
Folks,
This mail start a one week period to comment and propose changes to the
re-charter text. The call ends 12th Sep.
All the material from the Interim call#1 including the latest re-charter text
is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2014/09/02/dmm/proceedings.html
If you
Le 05/09/2014 10:48, Alper Yegin a écrit :
Alex,
DMM is not meant to be only about a bunch of MIP-based solutions.
There are various components in DMM solution space that'd also work with
GTP-based architectures.
For example, identifying the mobility needs of flows.
Or, conveying the mobility c
Hi Alex,
On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Le 05/09/2014 10:48, Alper Yegin a écrit :
>> Alex,
>>
>> DMM is not meant to be only about a bunch of MIP-based solutions.
>> There are various components in DMM solution space that'd also work with
>> GTP-based architectures.
>>
Le 05/09/2014 14:45, Alper Yegin a écrit :
Hi Alex,
On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Le 05/09/2014 10:48, Alper Yegin a écrit :
Alex,
DMM is not meant to be only about a bunch of MIP-based
solutions. There are various components in DMM solution space
that'd also work wit
Hello folks,
I have made various presentations at IETF, some from many years
ago, proposing that Mobile IP enable use of GTP as a tunneling
option. I still think that would be a good idea. Should I re-re-revive
a draft stating this in more detail?
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 9/5/2014 1:48 AM, Al
On 9/5/14 3:11 AM, "Jouni" wrote:
>
>Folks,
>
>This mail start a one week period to comment and propose changes to the
>re-charter text. The call ends 12th Sep.
>All the material from the Interim call#1 including the latest re-charter
>text is available at:
>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/inte
On Sep 5, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
>
>
> On 9/5/14 3:11 AM, "Jouni" wrote:
>
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> This mail start a one week period to comment and propose changes to the
>> re-charter text. The call ends 12th Sep.
>> All the material from the Interim call#1 including
10 matches
Mail list logo
