Hello folks,

I have made various presentations at IETF, some from many years
ago, proposing that Mobile IP enable use of GTP as a tunneling
option.  I still think that would be a good idea.  Should I re-re-revive
a draft stating this in more detail?

Regards,
Charlie P.


On 9/5/2014 1:48 AM, Alper Yegin wrote:
Alex,

DMM is not meant to be only about a bunch of MIP-based solutions.
There are various components in DMM solution space that'd also work with 
GTP-based architectures.
For example, identifying the mobility needs of flows.
Or, conveying the mobility characteristic of a prefix to the UE.

Alper




On Sep 4, 2014, at 1:14 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:

Le 03/09/2014 20:53, Brian Haberman a écrit :
Behcet,

On 9/3/14 2:33 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
You don't seem to understand my points.
That is quite possible.  Your comment on the list was "I am against any
deployment work before we decide on a solution..."

I read that as an objection to having the deployment models work item on
the agenda.  Please do tell me what I am missing.

Regards,
Brian
Hi,

I am following the discussion and me too I do not quite understand what is the 
complain.

I am happy to learn that a if a WG is to be formed then it would be around a 
solution rather than just requirements or architecture.

That said, I would like to express a worry along similar lines.

In DMM, precedents and the keen NETEXT, there seems to be a hard-rooted 
disconnect between the product developped - (P)Mobile IP - and the deployments. 
 We know for a fact that 3GPP deployments (2G/3G/4G) do not use (P)Mobile IP.  
We also know that 3GPP specs do mention Mobile IP. To such a point that I 
wonder whether 3GPP has not the same disconnect as here.

On another hand, we do have indications of where (P)Mobile IP is used - the 
trials, the projects, the kernel code, and not least the slideware attracting 
real customers.

The worry: develop DMM protocol while continuing the disconnect.

Alex







_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to