Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

Le 12/03/2018 à 00:58, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit : [...] However, I have difficulty to grasp the term 'distributed logical interface'. It sounds as if the same interface name, e.g. 'mn1mar1', was present on both MAAR1 and MAAR2. In reality, only the triplet 'MAC address',

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

Hi Alex, On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 11:06 +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > > Le 12/03/2018 à 00:58, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit : > [...] > > > However, I have difficulty to grasp the term 'distributed > > > logical > > > interface'. It sounds as if the same interface name, e.g. > > >

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

Hi Akbar, Thanks for the review. Comments inline below. On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 16:41 +, Rahman, Akbar wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > > Thanks for the updates. I think the document is in good shape and > should be adopted. > > I did have some small suggestions though for the next revision: > >

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

Hi Carlos, Thanks for the updates. I think the document is in good shape and should be adopted. I did have some small suggestions though for the next revision: 1) Abstract - Suggest to remove the last paragraph on "distributed logical interface" as it appears to be a detail and is not

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

Dear Satoru, I am Sridhar Bhaskaran - 3GPP CT4 delegate. In addition to John's questions, I have few more questions for clarification. 1. Section 5.2.2 of the draft says, UPF2_in : (Z,A) -> UPF2 maps the flow w/ SID list

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

A few questions for clarification: 1. Section 5.1.1, "..Since there is only one SID, there is no need to push an SRH..." In this case the outer IPv6 address representing a SID would contain a TEID. So for 1000 PDU sessions - would there be as many IPv6 addresses (representing SIDs/TEID in the

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

Dear Sridhar, It’s nice to see you in DMM list as well. :-) > [...snip...] > 1. Section 5.2.2 of the draft says, > > UPF2_in : (Z,A) -> UPF2 maps the flow w/ >SID list > > When the packet arrives to the

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

John, > 2018/03/13 7:37、John Kaippallimalil のメール: > > A few questions for clarification: > 1. Section 5.1.1, "..Since there is only one SID, there is no need to push an > SRH..." > In this case the outer IPv6 address representing a SID would contain a TEID. > So