Probably not. Its not updating RFC4283. Its defining new type values and
certainly it can be done in a separate document.
May be Chairs have a better view.
Sri
From: Hui Deng denghu...@gmail.commailto:denghu...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:09 PM
To: Sri Gundavelli
my apologies for forwarding this conversation to this list without
permission from Alper.
Behcet
-- Forwarded message --
From: Behcet Sarikaya sarikaya2...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: DMM's benefits
To: Alper Yegin alper.ye...@yegin.org,
Folks,
We held our first meeting on Mobility Exposure and Selection WT today.
The meeting was attended by: Fred, Danny, Jouni, Xinpeng, Anthony, John K.,
Byoung-Jo J, Alper.
You can see the outcome of the first call as captured in the following PPT:
Folks,
Let's schedule the second call on the week before IETF (as we discussed in
call#1).
Please fill in this doodle no later than the end of Monday (Oct 27).
http://doodle.com/etb6asznw8taggzq
I know Marco is arranging a call for the other WT. I'll make sure we don't
conflict with their's
