Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

On 12/21/15, 2:28 PM, "Behcet Sarikaya" wrote: >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) > wrote: >> Beat the protocol any time things don¹t go our way. >> >> >> Published September 14, 2015 >> >> >>

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

Beat the protocol any time things don¹t go our way. Published September 14, 2015 https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-07.txt I wonder why ? Academic interest ? On 12/21/15, 9:46 AM, "dmm on behalf of Behcet Sarikaya"

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: > Beat the protocol any time things don¹t go our way. > > > Published September 14, 2015 > > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-07.txt > Have you read that draft? Here is the abstract:

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

Behcet, Thank you for your constructive comments. I believe academic conferences/journals are not appropriate venues for PMIPv6/MIPv6 maintenance since these protocol families are already past their prime time as “hot research topics". Looking at the existing charter I cannot find too much

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

Hi Jouni, all, Let me ask what is the point in maintaining the protocols that no one uses? For academic purposes? If yes, then they should find their places in the conferences or journals. Now, mip4 WG has been closed. So is dmm going to maintain mip4 as well? Regards, Behcet On Fri, Dec 18,