On 12/21/15, 2:28 PM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <sarikaya2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) ><sgund...@cisco.com> wrote: >> Beat the protocol any time things don¹t go our way. >> >> >> Published September 14, 2015 >> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-nvo3-vmm-dmm-pmip-07.txt >> > >Have you read that draft? Here is the abstract: No. I never read your drafts. Its possible your titles and references to a protocol are clearly by accident. This is similar to your arguments which mix up things and confuse the issue. Your real issue is with BBF Hybrid Access work and you have a protocol in mind and which is fine. Blocking some other extensions with these comments is unfortunate. An extension it makes sense or not is based on WG interest and clearly this is also in scope of the charter. Sri _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
