Re: [DMM] draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-00

2018-03-23 Thread Dino Farinacci
If you want it to be direct, specific, and self documenting, I’d suggest “Address Replacement Function”. Then verbalize it by saying casually “ARFing the packet”. Dino > On Mar 23, 2018, at 10:36 AM, Tom Herbert wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:53 AM, Sri Gundavelli

Re: [DMM] draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-00

2018-03-23 Thread Tom Herbert
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:53 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: > > ILA-NAT-GW, or Locator-Rewrite Function ,,,should all work I guess. > Sri, I still like the term 'address transformation'. The difference between transformation and translation is that no information is

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

2018-03-23 Thread Alexandre Petrescu
Le 22/03/2018 à 18:49, Liaison Statement Management Tool a écrit : [...] SA2 would like to point out that among the four mechanisms for address configuration delivery mentioned in your LS reply (i.e. DHCPv4, DHCPv6, IPv6 ND and IKEv2) only the IPv6 ND mechanisms, and in particular the Router

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

2018-03-23 Thread Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Yes, in the LS response that we sent to 3GPP on 2/16, we did cite the below work. There are many proposals on this including: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-feng-dmm-ra-prefixtype-01.txt https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-08.txt Also, some proposals from the