Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

l/Docs/C4-182247.zip >>> >>> Thanks >>> Sridhar >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 6:55 AM >>> To: John Kaippallimalil <jo

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

ddress it in the draft. John -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tom Herbert Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 10:09 AM To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mo

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

ww.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ct/WG4_protocollars_ex-CN4/TSGCT4_83_Montreal/Docs/C4-182247.zip >> >> Thanks >> Sridhar >> >> -Original Message- >> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 6

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

toru Matsushima > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 6:55 AM > To: John Kaippallimalil <john.kaippallima...@huawei.com> > Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt > > John, > >> 2018/03/13 7:37、John Kaippa

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 6:55 AM To: John Kaippallimalil <john.kaippallima...@huawei.com> Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt John, > 2018/03/13 7:37、John Kaippall

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

age- > From: Satoru Matsushima [mailto:satoru.matsush...@gmail.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 7. März 2018 12:23 > To: Marco Liebsch > Cc: dmm > Subject: Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt > > Marco, > >> 2018/03/07 18:41、Marco Liebsch

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

steering implemented at the N3 interface. Would PCF/SMF provision this at gNB. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: Satoru Matsushima [mailto:satoru.matsush...@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 7. März 2018 12:23 To: Marco Liebsch Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) wrote: > Tom, > > Your understanding is correct: in the traditional mode there is no pushed SRH > • Less MTU overhead than GTP in traditional mode. > • In enhanced mode with underlay TE with SLA bandwidth

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

is standard behavior. marco -Original Message- From: Satoru Matsushima [mailto:satoru.matsush...@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 7. März 2018 12:23 To: Marco Liebsch Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt Marco, > 2018/03/07 18:41、Marco Lieb

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

and egress. In SR case it requires just 2 states at the ingresses for both directions. Cheers, --satoru > > marco > > > -Original Message- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima > Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 17:23 > To: Tom Herb

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

of the communication since the DL egress serves as uplink ingress, correct? marco -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 17:23 To: Tom Herbert Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

t; > Date: Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 01:34 > To: dmm <dmm@ietf.org> > Subject: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt > > > > Dear folks, > > > > A new revision of SRv6 Mobile User Plane draft has been submitted to IETF. > > > &

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 01:34 To: dmm <dmm@ietf.org> Subject: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt Dear folks, A new revision of SRv6 Mobile User Plane draft has been submitted to IETF. I’d pre

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

Hello Tom, >> A Big progress is that the draft supports interworking with GTP over IPv6 in >> addition to GTP over IPv4. >> And we have made change SRv6 function to IPv6 encapsulation with SRH instead >> of SRH insertion by default. >> > > Hi Satoru, > > If there are no intermediate hops od

Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

>A Big progress is that the draft supports interworking with GTP over IPv6 in >addition to GTP over IPv4. >And we have made change SRv6 function to IPv6 encapsulation with SRH instead >of SRH insertion by default. Good to see this and this addresses the RFC 8200 issue – but yes, little bit

[DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

Dear folks, A new revision of SRv6 Mobile User Plane draft has been submitted to IETF. I’d present brief summary of the updates, but the agenda seems already full so that it is uncertain I can do that. So let me share the summary of update on the -01 version here. A Big progress is that the