Re: [DMM] Call for adoption: draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility-03

Hi, I support adoption of this I-D. I think it is good as a starting point. Carlos On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 17:03 -0700, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Folks, > > This email starts a two week adoption call for the I-D >draft-yegin-dmm-ondemand-mobility-03 > to confirm its adoption as a DMM WG documen

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption: draft-wt-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00

Hi, I support adoption of this I-D. I think it is a very good starting point. Carlos On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 07:21 -0700, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Folks, > > This emails starts a two week call for the I-D >draft-wt-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00 > to confirm the adoption as a DMM WG document. The call ends A

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

Hi Jouni, all, Although I'm already late, I just wanted to express my post-adoption call to the three drafts. Carlos On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 08:32 -0800, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Folks, > > The WG adoption call for all three I-Ds have completed: > draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-para

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-05

Hi, Though I'm late I would like to express support on this document. I think it is ready to move forards. Carlos On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 10:16 -0700, Jouni wrote: > Folks, > > This email starts the WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility- > 05. Post your comment to the mailing list and also

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01

Hi, Very late, I know. But I'd like to express also support on this I-D. I think it is ready to move forward. Carlos On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 10:13 -0700, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Folks, > > This email starts the WGLC #2 for  > draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to > the

[DMM] Comment made during the session today

Hi, Regarding the comment I made related to draft-yan-dmm-man-00, this is the paper I've mentioned: "The costs and benefits of combining different IP mobility standards" Antonio de la Oliva, Ignacio Soto, María Calderón, Carlos J. Bernardos and M. Isabel Sanchez Computer Standards and Interfaces,

Re: [DMM] Comment made during the session today

between /dev/null and /dev/random > Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University > > #email: jonghy...@gmail.com > #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon > > > On Mar 28, 2017, at 01:05, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano > m.es> wrote: > > > > Hi, >

Re: [DMM] Distributed Mobility Anchoring - Draft Review Request

Hi Sri, Sure, no prob, but I might need one additional week as next week I'm off on vacation. Hope that's fine. Thanks, Carlos On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 15:14 +, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: > Hi Marco, Carlos, Seil & Biju, > > I believe you have all kindly agreed to review the below draft

Re: [DMM] Distributed Mobility Anchoring - Draft Review Request

ections > and comments on the earlier version if it is more convenient to you. > If the comment is on a particular page in an earlier version, I will > figure out where it applies to the latest version.  > > H. Anthony Chan > > -Original Message- > From: Carlos

Re: [DMM] Distributed Mobility Anchoring - Draft Review Request

s, Carlos On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 21:26 +, h chan wrote: > Carlos, > If you had already started to review version 3, I wonder if it might > work faster to send those comments first.  > I think the differences between version 3 and version 5 are mostly > not in major technical issues

Re: [DMM] Distributed Mobility Anchoring - Draft Review Request

Hi, I've reviewed -07 and I think all the comments I made to -05 have been address to a level good enough to make the document progress. I haven't been able to do a full review, but looking at the diff from -05 to -06 it seems OK to me. Apologies for the belated reply. Thanks, Carlos On Fri, 2

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as DMM WG document

Hi, I support adoption. Thanks, Carlos On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 00:02 +, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: > Folks: > > The following message commences a two week call for opinions on the > adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as a > DMM Working document. > > --- > T

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-08.txt

Hi Sri, Apologies for the delayed reaction. We were busy with the last minute I-D submission. Regarding the changes that went into -08, this is my summary: - Drastic shortening of the document, aiming at reducing its complexity and length. We have shortened from ~45 pages to ~15 pages. - Simpli

[DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

Hi, We have submitted a revised version of our draft addressing the comments we got in Singapore: - Added some statements about which model from draft-ietf-dmm- deployment-models our solution follows (addressing a comment received from Sri). - Added some text relating to draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-m

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-08.txt

;ll take the current version and we can follow your proposal to talk > before the f2f. > > marco > > -Original Message- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Jesús > Bernardos Cano > Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 22:40 > To: Sri Gundavelli

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

ed!] > edge ir the => edge or the [edge near the?] All fixed. Thanks a lot! Carlos > > Thanks and best regards > Dirk > -Original Message- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Jesús > Bernardos Cano > Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 23:18 &g

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

ould be described. Thanks, we will clarify in -02. We actually refer to the Valid Lifetime, so the address is deprecated. Thanks! Carlos > > Regards, > -Xinpeng (Jackie) > > -Original Message- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Jesús > Bernardos

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

Hi Alex, Thanks a lot for your review. Comments inline below. On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 18:29 +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > > Le 06/03/2018 à 23:17, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > We have submitted a revised version of our draft addressing the

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

Hi Alex, On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 11:06 +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > > Le 12/03/2018 à 00:58, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit : > [...] > > > However, I have difficulty to grasp the term 'distributed > > > logical > > > interface'.

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

ussions in the > mailer on this document. We therefore request the WG for feedback in > the mailer. We plan to issue an adoption call post IETF101, but we > need some feedback and substantial comments. > > > Dapeng & Sri > > > > > On 3/6/18, 2:17 PM, "dmm on

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

t regards, > > Daniel Corujo > Instituto de Telecomunicações - Pólo de Aveiro > http://www.it.pt > > > > Watch our VIDEO: https://youtu.be/lI8DnmBnEtU > Internet Technology Letters Journal is accepting publications: http:/ > /onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

with MFA ideas. > 4. SRv6 could be user plane protocol with the control plane protocol. > > One question here is that whether the authors are interested in User > Plane white paper which Kalyani lead files this solution. > > Cheers, > --satoru > > > 2018/03/06 22:1

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

Hi Sri, Thanks. We have just submitted it as draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-00 (no changes over draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01, we will now start addressing the comments received on the mailing list). Thanks! Carlos On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 16:46 +, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: > Thank you

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11.txt

Hi, We've just posted a new version addressing comments received from a very good review from Lyle. We need more reviews! Any volunteer? It's a short document to read. Thanks! Carlos On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 02:05 -0700, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-02.txt

Hi, We've just posted a new version addressing a very detailed review from Lyle (thanks!). Please, check and provide comments on the mailing list. Thanks, Carlos On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 02:16 -0700, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Dra

Re: [DMM] Comments on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-02

Hi Danny, Thanks a lot for the very good review you provided. We've just posted revision -03 addressing your comments. Rev -02 was also submitted after Montreal, addressing Lyle's also very good review. We'd like to ask the WG for feedback on current version. From authors' point of view the docum

[DMM] New DMM draft: draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00.txt

draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00.txt Thanks, Carlos -- Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/ GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part __

Re: [DMM] Review of draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00

; case and could be solved with a single mechanism. Client-based DMM is a topic that deserves additional attention. In our draft we have started to look at a network-based solution, but we can discuss the implications of a client-based solution as well. > > Looking forward to continued discu

Re: [DMM] Review of draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00

Hi Pete, Sorry for the late reply. Please see inline below. On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 18:58 +, Peter McCann wrote: > Hi, Carlos, > > Just a couple of response points below... > > Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote: > > Hi Pete, > > > > Thanks for the comments

Re: [DMM] review of draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00

-GW3, it is as a new router got attached to the link (no configuration step required by the MN). Thanks, Carlos > > What do you think? > > BR > Luowen -- Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/ GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67 signatu

Re: [DMM] New DMM draft: draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00.txt

be able to survive to an IP address change). Thanks, Carlos > > What do you think? > > Thanks, > marco > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > > Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano > &

[DMM] Network-based DMM demo at IETF 83

-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring We will try to make the demo after DMM session (we need to check with the DMM WG chairs, the ADs and the Secretariat). We'll announce the full details in proper time. Kind Regards, Carlos et al. -- Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/ G

Re: [DMM] New DMM draft: draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00.txt

Hi Marco, Thanks for your comment. Please see inline below. On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 10:00 +, Marco Liebsch wrote: > Carlos, > thanks for your feedback. Please see inline. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano [mailto:c...@it.uc3m.es]

Re: [DMM] review of draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00

etwork-based protocol and the solution is specified in the draft for PMIPv6. Not sure what your doubt comes from... > > Please see below. Please see my comment inline below. > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano > wrote: > > Hi Luowen, > > > &

Re: [DMM] Review of draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00

Hi Pete, Comments inline below... On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:38 +, Peter McCann wrote: > Hi, Carlos, > > Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote: > > Hi Pete, > > > > Sorry for the late reply. Please see inline below. > > > > On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 18:58 +00

Re: [DMM] review of draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00

Hi Behcet, On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 11:13 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano > wrote: > > Hi Behcet, > > > > On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 11:06 -0500, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > >> Hi Carlos,

[DMM] Network-based DMM demo (Thu 15:30 room 251)

ttp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00 -- Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/ GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Re: [DMM] 答复: Network-based DMM demo (Thu 15:30 room 251)

here and getting your feedback. > > Thanks, > > Carlos, Telemaco and Juan Carlos > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-pmip-01 > [2] > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00 > -- > Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netco

Re: [DMM] 答复: 答复: Network-based DMM demo (Thu 15:30 room 251)

; > camera) and a legacy IPv6 mobile node (a netbook). > > > > Looking forward to seeing you there and getting your feedback. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Carlos, Telemaco and Juan Carlos > > > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-berna

Re: [DMM] Network-based DMM demo (Thu 15:30 room 251)

Thanks, Carlos > > BR, > Rute Sofia > > On 03/27/2012 04:34 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We'd like to announce that our network-based DMM demo will take place on > > Thursday at 15:30 in room 251. > > > > The dem

[DMM] Network-based DMM demo (Thu 15:30 room 251)

a legacy IPv6 mobile node (a netbook). Looking forward to seeing you there and getting your feedback. Thanks, Carlos, Telemaco and Juan Carlos [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-pmip-01 [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-dmm-distributed-anchoring-00 -- Carlos J

Re: [DMM] WG Call for adoption: draft-chan-dmm-requirements-02

ien > ___ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm -- Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcoms.net GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67 +++

[DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02.txt]

list. We look forward to your new comments and reviews. Best regards, Juan-Carlos, Carlos, Telemaco and Charlie -- Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/ GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA 4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67 --- Begin Message --- A New Internet-Draft is available

Re: [DMM] Review of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02

lse is unauthorised. If you are not the intended > recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the > sender by return e-mail, Thanks. > -- Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano http://www.netcom.it.uc3m.es/ GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A56

Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap analysis" document

Dear chairs, We have been working on an update of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis, addressing the comments received on the mailing list and during the last meeting. Main changes from -02 are: - New section on 3GPP mobility. - New section on functional analysis. - New section on combined solution an

Re: [DMM] review on draft-ietf-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-02

Hi Jouni, Thanks for your review and comments. Please see some comments from us inline below. On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 21:43 +0300, Jouni wrote: > Folks, > > I did some brief reading on the -02 version (mainly to trigger even > some discussion!). Here are my initial comments. > > I am quite please

Re: [DMM] Preparing for DMM future steps and rechartering

Hi, I'm also jumping into the discussion a bit late. Without going into all the detailed discussions that have taken place recently, I just want to share my view on the MIP-based vs routing-based approach. IMHO, we probably need to further look at both approaches in this group, but with enough e

Re: [DMM] Preparing for DMM future steps and rechartering

o enable all models, we should converge on a reasonable > set of first work items to allow operators to enable DMM in their network. I agree. It would be helpful to get some feedback from operators on which deployments they have more interest on. Thanks, Carlos > > marco > > >

Re: [DMM] Preparing for DMM future steps and rechartering

Hi Marco, Thanks for the discussion. Please see inline below. On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 11:59 +, Marco Liebsch wrote: > Please see inline, Carlos. > > >-Original Message----- > >From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano [mailto:c...@it.uc3m.es] > >Sent: Mittwoch, 13. N

[DMM] Open DMM has been released!

Hi guys, We are happy to announce the public release of Open DMM, a platform meant to host open source DMM implementations and related efforts. You can go to our web site and start enjoying from real DMM code :D http://odmm.net/ So far, a network-based DMM solution is available (the one used in

Re: [DMM] Teleconference

Same here. Carlos On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:05 +, karag...@cs.utwente.nl wrote: > Hi Danny, Hi all, > > > > Yes, I am getting the same indication and I cannot vote! > > > Best regards, > > Georgios > > > > > __ > V

Re: [DMM] 回复： 回复： 回复： Teleconference

gt; > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > Alper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 4, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Dapeng Liu wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DMM] interims i.e. teleconferences..

Hi Jouni, all, I don't have major comments to the charter (though I'll try to perform a careful reading later on). However, I'm very interested in participate in the work ahead on DMM, and therefore I'd like to participate in the telcos where the structuring will be discussed. I'll be off on holi