On 2017-09-11 11:45, zap wrote:
It would have only these things different:
it would only be based off of unstable and experimental version, aka
pure rolling release,
That would count me (and many others) out right there.
it would be completely free software and use linux libre as the
> You are very good at suggesting work for other people to do. IMO, it
> makes no sense to further fragment the landscape but if that's what
> floats your boat, go for it. If you want a fork, just do it - don't
> make it our problem - and drop a note here when it's ready.
>
> golinux
>
Oh
>>
>
> You are very good at suggesting work for other people to do. IMO, it
> makes no sense to further fragment the landscape but if that's what
> floats your boat, go for it. If you want a fork, just do it - don't
> make it our problem - and drop a note here when it's ready.
>
Yes I knew
Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com):
> No, I just pointed out that the fact that IBM does indeed put hardware
> and software remote-control devices inside it's chips is an established
> and documented truth.
[...]
Noted without comment:
Has anyone installed virtualbox from jessie-backports? There is a systemd
dependency, but not sure whether it's functional or just a stub.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 09:55:27PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> zap - 11.09.17, 12:45:
> > it would be completely free software and use linux libre as the kernel,
>
> Why fork a complete distro just to provide a different kernel?
>
> I see no reason, why a linux-libre based kernel package
On 2017-09-11 15:05, zap wrote:
Oh there is one other reason, besides, a free software, and rolling
release,
now that I think about it, I also wanted it to START OUT AS A FORK...
but eventually become an independent distro apart from debian and
devuan that way keeping systemd and other
> Why fork a complete distro just to provide a different kernel?
>
> I see no reason, why a linux-libre based kernel package can´t be added to
> Devuan if someone, you?, is willing to create and maintain it.
>
> Thanks,
Oh there is one other reason, besides, a free software, and rolling
release,
zap - 11.09.17, 12:45:
> It would have only these things different:
>
> it would only be based off of unstable and experimental version, aka
> pure rolling release,
>
> it would be completely free software and use linux libre as the kernel,
>
> otherwise it would follow every other devuan
> If you need technical skills, supporting Devuan is a good way to learn them.
> Choose a simple issue from bugs.devuan.org, and submit a PR that fixes it.
> That will teach you how to build packages, and you’ll get good feedback from
> the core team on the “Devuan way” that you want to
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:45 PM, zap wrote:
> I am throwing this out there as an idea just in case someone has
> interest, otherwise I may somewhere down the road consider doing this
> myself when I actually get enough tech skills for such a thing or
> something...
If you
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:45:34PM -0400, zap wrote:
> It would have only these things different:
>
> it would only be based off of unstable and experimental version, aka
> pure rolling release,
>
> it would be completely free software and use linux libre as the kernel,
>
> otherwise it would
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:45 PM, zap wrote:
>
> It would have only these things different:
>
> it would only be based off of unstable and experimental version, aka
> pure rolling release,
>
> it would be completely free software and use linux libre as the kernel,
>
>
It would have only these things different:
it would only be based off of unstable and experimental version, aka
pure rolling release,
it would be completely free software and use linux libre as the kernel,
otherwise it would follow every other devuan guideline... and/or way of
thinking.
I am
It would have only these things different:
it would only be based off of unstable and experimental version, aka
pure rolling release,
it would be completely free software and use linux libre as the kernel,
otherwise it would follow every other devuan guideline... and/or way of
thinking.
I am
Hi again,
On 09/11/2017 04:44 PM, aitor wrote:
Hi Ozi,
On 08/22/2017 08:29 AM, Ozi Traveller wrote:
Adwaita and Clearlooks seems to be ok in ascii. I'm running openbox, tint2,
thunar, geany, and I think xfce4-terminal.
ozi
As i announced in the IRC channel, i'm
Hi Ozi,
On 08/22/2017 08:29 AM, Ozi Traveller wrote:
Adwaita and Clearlooks seems to be ok in ascii. I'm running openbox, tint2,
thunar, geany, and I think xfce4-terminal.
ozi
As i announced in the IRC channel, i'm working on new gtk-themes for
ascii, based on the
17 matches
Mail list logo