On Monday 23 October 2017 at 00:39:29, Fungi4All wrote:
> go to devuan''s front page and run a text search for onion
> it is right there
You mean accessing the Devuan repositories via the Tor network?
That's a network routing question, not a repository question.
Antony.
> > From: Antony
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 05:28:51PM -0400, Fungal-net wrote:
> I am still unclear on what the onion repositories are and what our choice is
> at this stage. Are we on amprolla3? Are debian's non onion addressed used
> automatically during upgrade or is it an illusion to see http://debian
On Sunday 22 October 2017 at 23:28:51, Fungal-net wrote:
> I am still unclear on what the onion repositories are
Me too - what are you referrring to?
> and what our choice is at this stage. Are we on amprolla3?
Well, according to what I've seen on the list so far, if you have
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:17:00 +0100, KatolaZ wrote in message
<20171022211700.gi4...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 05:50:54PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > ..I see the last mirror update on the Debian side was: ...
> > ftp-master.debian.org 2017-10-22 16:48
On Oct 21, 2017 10:05, "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" wrote:
> Tobias, until I read your posting a couple of days ago I did not realise
> that UEFI/Secure Boot can be configured such that ONLY my kernels can be
> booted, not even fresh install media from the vendor. Thank you very much.
>
I am still unclear on what the onion repositories are and what our choice is at
this stage. Are we on amprolla3? Are debian's non onion addressed used
automatically during upgrade or is it an illusion to see http://debian
through while the update takes
> From: sl...@troubleshooters.com
> To: dng
>
> Hi all,
>
> I basically said UEFI is junk and Secure Boot is an anti-small-distro
> monopolistic practice. These were, and continue to be, my opinions, but
> they're just one man's opinion. I can see use cases where Secure Boot
>
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 05:50:54PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
[cut]
>
> ..I see the last mirror update on the Debian side was: ...
> ftp-master.debian.org 2017-10-22 16:48 305
> arnt@d44:~/Taranis$ lynx -dump \
> http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/project/trace/ |grep _traces
> [ ]
On 10/22/2017 10:10 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 08:22:57 -0400
> fsmithred wrote:
>
>> On 10/22/2017 06:51 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 06:33:58 -0400
>>> fsmithred wrote:
>>>
On 10/22/2017
Hi all,
I basically said UEFI is junk and Secure Boot is an anti-small-distro
monopolistic practice. These were, and continue to be, my opinions, but
they're just one man's opinion. I can see use cases where Secure Boot
would be great, and I can see cases where something like UEFI would be
handy:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 16:03:33 +0200, Jaromil wrote in message
<20171022140333.rnvntd3gxn454vli@reflex>:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> > ..leaving "-t experimental" out while adding backports back in, I
> > now have a credible "1 Upgradeable,
> >
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 08:22:57 -0400
fsmithred wrote:
> On 10/22/2017 06:51 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 06:33:58 -0400
>> fsmithred wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/22/2017 05:18 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..leaving "-t experimental" out while adding backports back in, I now
> have a credible "1 Upgradeable, linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.3-rt-amd64
> version 4.9.30-2+deb9u5~bpo8+1" and still no New packages and a
> lowered "16 Obsolete and Locally Created
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:12:51 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
<20171022141252.7d06269c@d44>:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:14:24 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
> <20171022121424.4755f92c@d44>:
>
> > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:28:21 +0900, Olaf wrote in message
> > <87vaj7etwv@member.fsf.org>:
> >
> >
On 10/22/2017 06:51 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 06:33:58 -0400
> fsmithred wrote:
>
>> On 10/22/2017 05:18 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>>> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 16:47:57 -0500
>>> goli...@dyne.org wrote:
We are happy to announce that
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:14:24 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
<20171022121424.4755f92c@d44>:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:28:21 +0900, Olaf wrote in message
> <87vaj7etwv@member.fsf.org>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Arnt Karlsen writes:
> >
> > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 20:37:35 +0100, KatolaZ wrote in
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 06:33:58 -0400
fsmithred wrote:
> On 10/22/2017 05:18 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 16:47:57 -0500
>> goli...@dyne.org wrote:
>>> We are happy to announce that 'amprolla3', the rewrite of nextime's
>>> amprolla by parazyd and
On 10/22/2017 05:18 AM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 16:47:57 -0500
> goli...@dyne.org wrote:
>> We are happy to announce that 'amprolla3', the rewrite of nextime's
>> amprolla by parazyd and Wizzup, is finally up and running and ready
>> to be tested.
>
> All right, tested:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:28:21 +0900, Olaf wrote in message
<87vaj7etwv@member.fsf.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Arnt Karlsen writes:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 20:37:35 +0100, KatolaZ wrote in message
> > <20171021193735.gg4...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:48:57PM +0200,
On 10/22/2017 12:39 PM, Jaromil wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, Lars Noodén wrote:
>> Who can update it fix the wording and the link and how did it get closed
>> off?
>
> I can, its in my TODO and will be done soon.
Thanks.
/Lars
___
Dng mailing list
hi all
out of Arnt's and Olaf testing and reporting, its made clear that we
need to improveme on amprolla3: we need a "warnlist" for packages that
are overrinding devuan's forked packages. IMHO when debian updates a
package forked by devuan in any of the available suites, the warnlist
would file
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, Lars Noodén wrote:
> Who can update it fix the wording and the link and how did it get closed
> off?
I can, its in my TODO and will be done soon.
ciao
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
Thanks everyone for adding details,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Patrick Meade wrote:
> https://github.com/lamby/pkg-redis/commit/6a9e4d0142b45195a0d55945bbc558df4c48707b#diff-9e388da7cd119765989cc22d2bc07e5c
This diff clearly shows that redis-sentinel example scripts provided
by upstream redis
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 16:47:57 -0500
goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> Dear dev1rs,
Are these some sort of devs-running-daemon devi1s? :-)
> We are happy to announce that 'amprolla3', the rewrite of nextime's
> amprolla by parazyd and Wizzup, is finally up and running and ready
> to be tested.
Hi,
Testing on my workstation + some servers: it works like a charm, thank
you for your effort in improving our distro!
Alberto
On 20/10/17 22:47, goli...@dyne.org wrote:
Dear dev1rs,
We are happy to announce that 'amprolla3', the rewrite of nextime's
amprolla by parazyd and Wizzup, is
25 matches
Mail list logo