A lightweight browser would be welcome. Does anyone have a practical
way to migrate bookmarks from Chrome or Chromium to such a lightweight
browser?
qupzilla can import chromium bookmarks. i'm sure other actively
maintained browsers have the same capability.
- Gravis
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015
Hence my original suggestion: for a distro
that's still trying to get on its feet, a lightweight browser would
probably be best, like midori, dillo or something else.
right because giving people the option of using their prefered browser
is a bad idea!
I don't think
the effort of
My recent usage demonstrated Firefox to be more efficient
than Chrome on a 1 GiB netbook. I would suggest the
ESR version of Firefox as a starter browser.
Qupzilla or Midori could also serve as initial included browser.
The idea is only to provide a means to download a desired browser.
-Original Message-
From: Nate Bargmann [mailto:n...@n0nb.us]
Sent: Saturday, March 7, 2015 6:36 PM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Plan for Devuan to use Mozilla products as is
Unfortunately, this sort of inconsistency toward their definition of
stable caused problems
Go look at the code, it's open is a common argument i hear from
pro-systemd advocates. Curious. About looking at the code: have you
personally audited chrome's code, top to bottom, OpenBSD-style? 'Cos if you
haven't - it is a big piece of software -, well your argument is moot
Nuno,
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:06 PM, T.J. Duchene t.j.duch...@gmail.com wrote:
If someone has issue with the code, it's open. Go look for yourself. I beg
everyone's kind indulgence and excuse me for saying this, but the conspiracy
theories about Google and the Chromium source code come from people
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 02:19:43PM -0600, T.J. Duchene wrote:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2015/msg00031.html
I think ^THIS is probably the biggest reason not to use Chromium.
Never mind whether it's affiliated with Google or whether that makes it
untrustworthy.
On 6 March 2015 09:06:45 CET, Neo Futur d...@ww7.be wrote:
the Grsecurity/Pax hardening of the kernel, will you think of it,
instead of SELinux, or as an option besides SELinux? It sure will be
attainable in the way I got it in Debian in that Tip, but official
support would be so great!
the Grsecurity/Pax hardening of the kernel, will you think of it,
instead of SELinux, or as an option besides SELinux? It sure will be
attainable in the way I got it in Debian in that Tip, but official
support would be so great!
https://git.devuan.org/groups/hardened
we are a few guys
If I understand what you are saying you mean that a link to site A which links
to copyrighted material on site B is itself a violation of copyright.
no, what i mean is that he was the one who uploaded the clips to
youtube, got banned from youtube and then posted the links on a forum
to the
**Looks around**
Full moon tonight?
On 5 March 2015 at 19:51, miroslav.rov...@zg.ht.hr wrote:
I want to add my thoughts and feelings to this conversation.
But since this is my first message to this list, here're a few links of
my tips, user-to-user (I'm not an expert and I'm just a fraction
Really? The Surveillance Engine Terminated All My Videos
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=3t=113059
you are not a victim here. your videos were terminated because they
violated copyright law which they are required to enforce. apparently
you are a repeat offender and thus correctly
On March 5, 2015 at 11:26 PM Gravis rin...@adaptivetime.com wrote:
the link you posted links to a clip from Al Jazeera that was taken
down due to copyright infringement. you do realize that content from
Al Jazeera is copyright and that posting it without permission is
copyright
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:41:52PM +0200, Martijn Dekkers wrote:
**Looks around**
Full moon tonight?
Well, I don't respond in kind. I was derided and attacked earlier in
Debian Fora, but my topics and my tips ended up being read and
followed. And they are in Gentoo Fora.
I'd just point to
I was derided and attacked earlier in Debian Fora
why am i not surprised? -_-
- Gravis
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:44 PM, miroslav.rov...@zg.ht.hr wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:41:52PM +0200, Martijn Dekkers wrote:
**Looks around**
Full moon tonight?
Well, I don't respond in kind. I
* On 2015 05 Mar 07:22 -0600, Jaromil wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
Mutt is on my todo-stack
in case you fancy an out-of-the box setup of msmtp, fetchmail, mutt and
notmuch search over maildirs plus abook integration, have a look at
I want to add my thoughts and feelings to this conversation.
But since this is my first message to this list, here're a few links of
my tips, user-to-user (I'm not an expert and I'm just a fraction of a
programmer if at all), [user-to-user] tips:
Grsecurity/Pax installation on Debian GNU/Linux
Am Donnerstag, 5. März 2015 schrieb william moss:
On 03/04/2015 07:06 PM, Ed Ender wrote:
[...]
Opera for the browser.
Thunderbird or Claws for email, though the Opera client is good.
Does it have maildir? All those one-big-file-for-everything mailbox style
clients are pestilenze for
On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Jude Nelson jud...@gmail.com wrote:
Besides issues related to Chromium's poor support for privacy features,
it also has no real security support.
No comment on the privacy features, but I beg to differ on the security.
The fact that the Linux build of Chromium
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
Mutt is on my todo-stack
in case you fancy an out-of-the box setup of msmtp, fetchmail, mutt and
notmuch search over maildirs plus abook integration, have a look at
https://www.dyne.org/software/jaro-mail :^)
I certainly plan to package it for Devuan.
as a matter of fact, it is!
http://www.moongiant.com/Full_Moon_New_Moon_Calendar.php
the good news is that friday the 13th wont coincide with a full moon
for another 34 years. turns out, the last one was this past June.
- Gravis
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Martijn Dekkers
This is textual representation from links -dump
https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/thread/20150305.194152.e5e48ea9.en.html .
||M...|| Gravis 2015-03-05 05:22
||M| Dr. Nikolaus Klepp 2015-03-05 08:04
||.M Dr.
you are not a victim here. your videos were terminated because they
violated copyright law which they are required to enforce. apparently
you are a repeat offender and thus correctly deemed untrustworthy.
You don't know that to be truth what you are claiming. And you are calling me
a lier
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:45:22PM +0100, Anto wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I guess it is very likely that the first release of Devuan will use
the re-branded Mozilla products.
As far as I understood, the main reason for the re-branding is the
Mozilla license that does not comply with DSFG
cents!
Ed
-Original Message- From: T.J. Duchene
[t.j.duch...@gmail.com] Date: 03/04/2015 06:14 PM To:
dng@lists.dyne.org Subject: Re: [Dng] Plan for Devuan to use
Mozilla products as is
On 03/04/2015 01:25 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I guess it is very likely that the first release
a lot of devuan packages are just rebuilt debian packages. we dont
need more work than we already have, so why bother with
re-re-branding? if you can't stomach chromium then i suggest you
check out qupzilla because it has to speed of chromium, the interface
of firefox and no google integration.
Besides issues related to Chromium's poor support for privacy features,
it also has no real security support.
No comment on the privacy features, but I beg to differ on the security.
The fact that the Linux build of Chromium runs each tab and plugin in its
own seccomp'ed process and runs them
...@excite.com
CC: dng@lists.dyne.org dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Plan for Devuan to use Mozilla products as is
Personally, I would rather stay away from the world of Google. Although I
have no real say in the matter.
That IMO would be a security breach, considering their ties to government
don't understand where you got child pornography from.
-Original Message-
From: Gravis [rin...@adaptivetime.com]
Date: 03/04/2015 09:16 PM
To: Ed Ender skae...@excite.com
CC: dng@lists.dyne.org dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Plan for Devuan to use Mozilla products
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 21:09 -0500, Jude Nelson wrote:
Besides issues related to Chromium's poor support for privacy features,
it also has no real security support.
No comment on the privacy features, but I beg to differ on the security.
The fact that the Linux build of Chromium runs each
They do not support anything but the current version
unbuildable on a stable Debian release because they freely import dependencies
They don't even support RHEL 6
you have this /backwards/, your _software_distributor_ isn't
supporting Chromium. there are literally tens of thousands of
On 03/04/2015 01:25 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I guess it is very likely that the first release of Devuan will use
the re-branded Mozilla products.
As far as I understood, the main reason for the re-branding is the
Mozilla license that does not comply with DSFG
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:14:26PM -0600, T.J. Duchene wrote:
Is Devuan going to use the exact same guideline? If not,is there any
plan for Devuan to use Mozilla products as is in the future,
especially Firefox and Thunderbird?
If I might offer an alternative suggestion? I'd rather see
33 matches
Mail list logo
