On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:45:19 +0200
Antony Stone wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2017 08:19:54 Jaromil wrote:
> > but not GNOME! As with systemd, we are confident this won't hinder
> > user's freedom of choice since one can always go use Ubuntu or
> > Debian
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:45:19AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote:
>
> Is there a short answer (or can you point me at docs) to the question "what
> makes a DE dependent on systemd?"
>
The decision by the developers to use its interfaces instead of the traditional
ones.
-- hendrik
On Tuesday 13 June 2017 08:19:54 Jaromil wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Antony Stone wrote:
> > So, are Gnome and KDE currently still "known to suffer from some glitches
> > due to the lack of systemd" (and if so, are these documented anywhere)?
> >
> > Or can these be expected to work as well as
hi Antony,
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Antony Stone wrote:
> So, are Gnome and KDE currently still "known to suffer from some glitches due
> to the lack of systemd" (and if so, are these documented anywhere)?
>
> Or can these be expected to work as well as XFCE, and as well as Debian
> Jessie
>
Hi.
https://devuan.org/os/debian-fork/stable-2nd-candidate-announce-050517
I notice that the above RC2 release notes say "Removed GNOME, KDE, and
Cinnamon as DE options in tasksel. These three DEs are still (mostly)
installable after the installation is complete, but they are known to suffer