Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op

2018-07-18 Thread Ulrich Wisser
+1 Paul Hoffman schrieb am Mi., 18. Juli 2018 um 16:21 Uhr: > Yes, please! > > --Paul Hoffman > > ___ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > -- Ulrich Wisser ulr...@wisser.se

Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op

2018-07-18 Thread Paul Hoffman
Yes, please! --Paul Hoffman ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op

2018-07-18 Thread Amelia Andersdotter
+1 on adoption On 2018-07-18 20:48, Dan York wrote: > > >> On Jul 18, 2018, at 2:14 PM, Tim Wicinski > > wrote: >> >> >> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op >> >> The draft is available here: >>

Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op

2018-07-18 Thread Dan York
> On Jul 18, 2018, at 2:14 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op/ >

Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op

2018-07-18 Thread Jim Reid
> On 18 Jul 2018, at 19:25, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote: > > I support the adoption of this work into the WG. +1 ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op

2018-07-18 Thread Barry Raveendran Greene
I support the adoption of this work into the WG. > On Jul 18, 2018, at 14:14, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op/ > > Please review

[dns-privacy] The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2018-07-18 Thread IETF Secretariat
The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op/ ___ dns-privacy mailing list

[dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op

2018-07-18 Thread Tim Wicinski
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DPRIVE, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.

Re: [dns-privacy] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-18 Thread Warren Kumari
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:50 AM Alexander Mayrhofer < alex.mayrhofer.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Warren, > > thanks for your review and COMMENTS. Responses below: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for > >

Re: [dns-privacy] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-18 Thread Alexander Mayrhofer
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> Would that address your DISCUSS? > > > Yes, but the pseudo-random text still seems to be there. Understood - i'm proposing to change the section to the following: 4.2.2. Random Length Padding When using Random Length Padding, a

Re: [dns-privacy] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-18 Thread Alexander Mayrhofer
Hello Mirja, thanks for the review and your COMMENT. Response inline: On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: No Objection > >

Re: [dns-privacy] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-18 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Alexander Mayrhofer < alex.mayrhofer.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Eric, > > thanks for your review. Responses inline: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:00 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > >

Re: [dns-privacy] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-18 Thread Alexander Mayrhofer
Warren, thanks for your review and COMMENTS. Responses below: On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: Yes > >

Re: [dns-privacy] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2018-07-18 Thread Alexander Mayrhofer
Eric, thanks for your review. Responses inline: On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:00 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: Discuss > > -- >

Re: [dns-privacy] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-18 Thread Alexander Mayrhofer
Ben, thanks for your review and COMMENT. Responses inline below: On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: No Objection > >

Re: [dns-privacy] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: (with COMMENT)

2018-07-18 Thread Alexander Mayrhofer
Benjamin, thanks for the review. Comments inline: On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05: No Objection > > --

Re: [dns-privacy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05.txt

2018-07-18 Thread Alexander Mayrhofer
Question to the broader Working Group: Shall i include the following strategy into the document at this stage, or should we (see "EXPERIMENTAL" document status) divert this into a future specification which updates or obsoletes the current document? Comments appreciated. best, Alex On Thu, Jun