yang7
> Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for
> draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt
>
> Il 21/07/2020 02:27 Z.W. Yan ha scritto:
>
>
> Correct, Stephane, the notification from resolver is more direct.
> However, based
, :-)
Z.W. Yan
From: Vittorio Bertola
Date: 2020-07-21 20:28
To: Z.W. Yan
CC: gggeng; xincha.zhang; dns-privacy; liuyang7
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Fw: New Version Notification for
draft-yan-dprive-local-service-indication-02.txt
Il 21/07/2020 02:27 Z.W. Yan ha scritto:
Correct
> Il 21/07/2020 02:27 Z.W. Yan ha scritto:
>
>
> Correct, Stephane, the notification from resolver is more direct.
> However, based on DHCP/ICMP is also an approach because the end-user is
> always bootstrapping based on DHCP/ICMP for the address configuration and so
>
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:17:57AM +0800,
Z.W. Yan wrote
a message of 120 lines which said:
> The motivation of this draft is to actively indicate the privacy
> protection capability of the recursive server.
The approach in draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-information seems better since:
* it is
Dear All,
The motivation of this draft is to actively indicate the privacy protection
capability of the recursive server.
We can consider the extension of ND and DHCP protocols to support this
configuration.
BR,
Zhiwei
From: internet-drafts
Date: 2020-07-13 08:41
To: Xinchang Zhang; Zhiwei Yan;
