Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

All, The updated charter is on the IESG's agenda for their May 24th telechat. If all goes well there, it will be sent to the IETF community for review. Regards, Brian On 4/10/18 11:30 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > Thanks for the feedback. Tim and I will add some milestones to the

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

All, Thanks for the feedback. Tim and I will add some milestones to the proposed charter and get it to our illustrious AD for review/handling. Regards, Brian On 3/21/18 9:44 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > Slightly updated text to capture a missing work item... > >

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

Let's retry the tests with a hot cache, since that's maybe a bit more fair. I've picked the shortest times I could get, which involved heating up the resolver until it was no longer waiting 10s or 30s on lame authoritative servers. Unbound 1.6.0 TCP 8s Unbound 1.6.0 UDP 0.4s BIND 9.11 TCP 0.5s

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

Charter 2.1 looks fine to me. On 5 April 2018 at 12:44, Brian Haberman wrote: > Tim & I are still looking for feedback on this updated charter. Please > chime in or we will have to close the WG down. > > Brian > > > On 3/21/18 9:44 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: >> Slightly

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

Hi Ian, > On 7 Apr 2018, at 08:05, Ian Maddison wrote: > > Hi Benno, > > On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, at 01:35, Benno Overeinder wrote: >> >> >> All solutions above are stable performant DNS-over-TLS implementations. >> The open-source developers of all DNS resolvers mentioned above

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

Hi Benno, On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, at 01:35, Benno Overeinder wrote: > For information to the WG, Unbound and Knot Resolver have implemented> > DNS-over-TLS for one or two years now, and both are in use. > Also qname> minimalisation has been implemented in Unbound and Knot Resolver > for 2> years

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

> On Apr 6, 2018, at 3:28 PM, Ian Maddison wrote: > I'd be extremely disappointed to see hear of the premature demise of this WG. > As we approach the fifth anniversary of the summer of Snowden, I've the > impression > of a job half one, despite all the commendable efforts of

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

Hi, Not necessarily reacting on the re-charter text discussion, but trying to clear-out some potential misunderstanding (with me maybe?). On 04/07/2018 12:28 AM, Ian Maddison wrote: > Solid stub to recursive and qnamemin standards have been established but > currently bind is the only performant

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

Dear DPriv On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, at 21:44, Brian Haberman wrote: > Tim & I are still looking for feedback on this updated charter. Please> chime > in or we will have to close the WG down. At first I was quite surprised to read this, especially in the current climate, but on second thoughts

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

The new charter text seems fine, even if we don't actually do all four work items. --Paul Hoffman ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

On 05/04/18 20:44, Brian Haberman wrote: > Tim & I are still looking for feedback on this updated charter. Please > chime in or we will have to close the WG down. LGTM. Don't close it down. Get folks to do the work:-) S > > Brian > > > On 3/21/18 9:44 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: >> Slightly

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

Slightly updated text to capture a missing work item... https://github.com/DPRIVE/wg-materials/blob/master/dprive-charter-2.1.txt Regards, Brian On 3/19/18 11:07 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > The chairs have been chatting with our AD about re-chartering the > WG. The text below is our

Re: [dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

Stephane Good catch. I had excised it from the Work Items, but missed the one in the main text. Tim On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:07:24AM -0400, > Brian Haberman wrote > a message of

[dns-privacy] Potential re-charter text

All, The chairs have been chatting with our AD about re-chartering the WG. The text below is our proposed charter that we will discuss in our session this week. Regards, Brian & Tim DPRIVE Charter 2.0 The DNS PRIVate Exchange (DPRIVE) Working Group develops mechanisms to provide