Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] NXDOMAIN on exisiting A record

2019-07-07 Thread Alex Litvak
(luck of sleep, fixing some mistakes in text) Hello everyone, I run consul services on my network where services are registered with .service.consul when they start. All containers and bare metal hosts are running dnsmasq 2.80. I noticed that if I restart one of the containers, one of the

[Dnsmasq-discuss] NXDOMAIN on exisiting A record

2019-07-07 Thread Alex Litvak
Hello every one, I run consul services on my network where servics are registered with xyz.service.consul when they start. All containers and bare metal hosts are running dnsmasq 2.80. I noticed that if I restart one of the containers one of the hosts continue failing to resolve the server

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] misunderstanding negative caching

2019-04-04 Thread Alex Litvak
Thank you for your reply Simon. If DNS service is down and dnsmasq receive immediate icmp reject will this be a) cached, b) handled as immediate error with next name server tried immediately, or c) just a timeout within system defined time out? We are looking to avoid a delay with failing /

[Dnsmasq-discuss] misunderstanding negative cache

2019-03-26 Thread Alex Litvak
Dear list, I configured dnsmasq with enabled negative cache and neg-ttl 600. I attempted to use it with a query that times out (configured fake dns servers in the config file). When I ping a host I have NXDOMAIN in logs. However every time I ping it dnsmasq asks those servers to resolve the