Am 13.10.19 um 00:34 schrieb Simon Kelley:
> The patch in the buzilla entry looks good to me. The dnsmasq code is
> wrong and has been for some time. The version-dependent failure is
> probably down to the order in which the data is added to the control
> array, or the relative size of the two
On 05/10/2019 09:44, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 05.10.19 um 09:54 schrieb Geert Stappers:
>> Questions:
>> Which version of Dnsmasq did work? ( git bi-sect known good)
>> Which version of Dnsmasq doesn't work? ( git bi-sect known bad)
>>
>> In case it is stated in
>>>
Am 05.10.19 um 09:54 schrieb Geert Stappers:
> Questions:
> Which version of Dnsmasq did work? ( git bi-sect known good)
> Which version of Dnsmasq doesn't work? ( git bi-sect known bad)
>
> In case it is stated in
>>
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 09:00:25AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have received a bug report where TFTP regresses on newer FreeBSD
> versions and breaks on 11.3 and 12.0 with IPv4 where older FreeBSD
> releases (that are now weeks before EOL) work,
> with some kind of analysis,
Greetings,
I have received a bug report where TFTP regresses on newer FreeBSD
versions and breaks on 11.3 and 12.0 with IPv4 where older FreeBSD
releases (that are now weeks before EOL) work,
with some kind of analysis, here:
