Hi all. I'm try to use ipv6 slaac addresses and get global routing in
my simple network.
What i need to specify in dnsmasq.conf to provide global prefix to nodes?
Now i write
dhcp-range=::1,slaac,5m
dhcp-option=option6:dns-server,[::]
enable-ra
But when i ping6 some ipv6 addr i get error
Le 01/04/2014 08:54, Vasiliy Tolstov a écrit :
Hi all. I'm try to use ipv6 slaac addresses and get global routing in
my simple network.
What i need to specify in dnsmasq.conf to provide global prefix to nodes?
Now i write
dhcp-range=::1,slaac,5m
dhcp-option=option6:dns-server,[::]
enable-ra
2014-04-01 11:12 GMT+04:00 Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr:
Hi Vasiliy,
What is the *exact* command that you used to ping6? If you don't want to
disclose the actual target, use e.g. albert.aribaud.net, which should
resolve in IPv6 and answer (reasonable) IPv6 pings.
Also, did you have
2014-04-01 11:26 GMT+04:00 Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr:
Ok, then, did you have a look at your router's and client's DHCP, network
and/or system logs?
why i need dhcp logs? i don't use it. all that i have - dnsmasq with
radv enabled and nodes with slaac configured addresses.
--
Le 01/04/2014 09:38, Vasiliy Tolstov a écrit :
2014-04-01 11:26 GMT+04:00 Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr:
Ok, then, did you have a look at your router's and client's DHCP, network
and/or system logs?
why i need dhcp logs? i don't use it. all that i have - dnsmasq with
radv enabled and
2014-04-01 12:14 GMT+04:00 Albert ARIBAUD albert.arib...@free.fr:
DHCP and/*OR* network and/*OR* system logs... :)
Nothing printed =). Sorry for noise. I'm switch to radv via bird
routing daemon =).
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
jabber: v...@selfip.ru
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote:
my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and
testing nettle did get compared to something more widely(!)
used
something being used a lot != something being good
Absolutely
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:54 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote:
my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and
testing nettle did get compared to something more widely(!)
used
On 01/04/14 1:45 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:54 AM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote:
my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and
testing nettle did get compared
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:54 PM, /dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
a
I can't speak to an actual code audit, but nettle isn't some third-rate
clone. It's a mature, actively developed and (importantly) thoroughly
documented project.
If I were to undertake such an audit however, I would surely
With such superior understanding, shouldn't you be adding OpenSSL support
to dnsmasq yourself? That way you can deal with their byzantine API and the
resulting bugs, and Simon can instead do something actually worthwhile.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote:
On
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 10:45:44AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
And thus I enthusiastically support other OSes than linux,
other dns servers besides bind, and other crypto libraries
besides openssl.
One named to rule them all
One named to find them
One named to bring them all
And in the darkness
On 01/04/14 19:14, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
With such superior understanding, shouldn't you be adding OpenSSL support
to dnsmasq yourself? That way you can deal with their byzantine API and the
resulting bugs, and Simon can instead do something actually worthwhile.
But don't do that before the
13 matches
Mail list logo
