On 01/04/14 19:14, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> With such superior understanding, shouldn't you be adding OpenSSL support
> to dnsmasq yourself? That way you can deal with their byzantine API and the
> resulting bugs, and Simon can instead do something actually worthwhile.
>
>
But don't do that before
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 10:45:44AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> And thus I enthusiastically support other OSes than linux,
> other dns servers besides bind, and other crypto libraries
> besides openssl.
One named to rule them all
One named to find them
One named to bring them all
And in the darkness
With such superior understanding, shouldn't you be adding OpenSSL support
to dnsmasq yourself? That way you can deal with their byzantine API and the
resulting bugs, and Simon can instead do something actually worthwhile.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 01/04/14 2:02 PM,
On 01/04/14 2:02 PM, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
Maybe OpenSSL is the right choice anyway, I don't know. But, I thought
someone should speak up for nettle :)
speaking up for nettle means nothing when you don't understand the
issue at hand.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous c
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:54 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> a
I can't speak to an actual code audit, but nettle isn't some third-rate
clone. It's a mature, actively developed and (importantly) thoroughly
documented project.
If I were to undertake such an audit however, I would surely prefer to have
t
On 01/04/14 1:45 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:54 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote:
my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and
testing nettle did get compared to something m
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:54 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
>> On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote:
>> > my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and
>> > testing nettle did get compared to something more widely(!)
>> > used
>>
>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:08:44PM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 25/03/14 07:03 PM, sven falempin wrote:
> > my concern of nettle vs openssl is the amount of review and
> > testing nettle did get compared to something more widely(!)
> > used
>
> something being used a lot != something being good
Ab
2014-04-01 12:14 GMT+04:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
> DHCP and/*OR* network and/*OR* system logs... :)
Nothing printed =). Sorry for noise. I'm switch to radv via bird
routing daemon =).
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru
jabber: v...@selfip.ru
Le 01/04/2014 09:38, Vasiliy Tolstov a écrit :
2014-04-01 11:26 GMT+04:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
Ok, then, did you have a look at your router's and client's DHCP, network
and/or system logs?
why i need dhcp logs? i don't use it. all that i have - dnsmasq with
radv enabled and nodes with slaac confi
2014-04-01 11:26 GMT+04:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
> Ok, then, did you have a look at your router's and client's DHCP, network
> and/or system logs?
why i need dhcp logs? i don't use it. all that i have - dnsmasq with
radv enabled and nodes with slaac configured addresses.
--
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail:
Hi again Vasiliy,
Le 01/04/2014 09:20, Vasiliy Tolstov a écrit :
2014-04-01 11:12 GMT+04:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
Hi Vasiliy,
What is the *exact* command that you used to ping6? If you don't want to
disclose the actual target, use e.g. albert.aribaud.net, which should
resolve in IPv6 and answer (re
2014-04-01 11:12 GMT+04:00 Albert ARIBAUD :
> Hi Vasiliy,
>
> What is the *exact* command that you used to ping6? If you don't want to
> disclose the actual target, use e.g. albert.aribaud.net, which should
> resolve in IPv6 and answer (reasonable) IPv6 pings.
>
> Also, did you have a look at your
Le 01/04/2014 08:54, Vasiliy Tolstov a écrit :
Hi all. I'm try to use ipv6 slaac addresses and get global routing in
my simple network.
What i need to specify in dnsmasq.conf to provide global prefix to nodes?
Now i write
dhcp-range=::1,slaac,5m
dhcp-option=option6:dns-server,[::]
enable-ra
But
Hi all. I'm try to use ipv6 slaac addresses and get global routing in
my simple network.
What i need to specify in dnsmasq.conf to provide global prefix to nodes?
Now i write
dhcp-range=::1,slaac,5m
dhcp-option=option6:dns-server,[::]
enable-ra
But when i ping6 some ipv6 addr i get error connect:
15 matches
Mail list logo
