.x is the ip address.
The IP-address of what?
> In the log we can see that it's referencing the domain as:
> for domain #
> config error is REFUSED (EDE:not ready)"
I haven't tried yet to reproduce the error.
I don't understand what the
> --server=/#/x.x.x.x \
is supposed
The manual page had "list or RR-types",
changed it into "list of RR-types".
Reported-by: Justin
---
man/dnsmasq.8 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/man/dnsmasq.8 b/man/dnsmasq.8
index 30429df..d131bbe 100644
--- a/man/dnsmasq.8
+++ b/man/dnsmasq.8
@@ -390,7
.
Other idea: network name spaces
I haven't played with network ns. I can't tell if it solves
the "problem" of OP. But it is what I expect from name spaces.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing li
USED:
> >
> > i think no-resolv might cause that...
>
> no-resolv tells dnsmasq not to read /etc/resolv.conf but use servers
> specified in dnsmasq.conf, in this case 8.8.4.4 and 8.8.8.8
>
> it could cause troubles if e.g. pr
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 09:48:04PM +0100, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2023, at 20:27, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, Graham Leggett wrote:
> >> I have a dnsmasq config on a development machine that looks like this:
> >>
> >> dhcp-ra
er it correctly configured until proven otherwise.
> Regards,
> Graham
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:00:59PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 10:47 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 09:14:13PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> > > --- a/man/dnsmasq.8
> > > +++ b/man/dnsmasq.8
> > > @@ -1317
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 12:53:32PM +, Ercolino De Spiacico wrote:
> About strict-order
>
> As I'm reading online this prefers one server over the others and
> skips to the second in order of preference only if the first is to
> fail.
Qouting dnsmasq manual page:
-o, --strict-order
are
The work in progress patch has been seen. At least by me.
I think I have seen simular content in the existing man page.
I hope the next version integrates with what is already there.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
Previous-Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] wip: Add tag: usage in dhcp-option
In-Reply-To:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:27:28PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 1:06 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:00:59PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> > &
ix DHCPv6 options memory leaks
|hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
|When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
|If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
|To restore the original branch and stop patching, ru
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:53:19PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:33 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 05:27:28PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, I wonder if maybe there should be multiple dnsmasq.conf
> > &g
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 01:41:51PM -0700, Wink Saville wrote:
> --- a/man/dnsmasq.8
> +++ b/man/dnsmasq.8
> @@ -1324,7 +1352,6 @@ netmask, broadcast, router, DNS server, domainname
> and hostname. Thus, for DHCPv
> .B --dhcp-option = option:router
> will result in no router option being sent,
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 05:56:41PM +0200, Damian Sawicki via Dnsmasq-discuss
wrote:
> Hello dnsmasq experts,
>
> There seems to be a memory leak in v2.88. The reproduction steps are
> as follows: insert an SRV record with TTL=0 in an upstream DNS server
> and query dnsmasq for this record. I
it-send-email.io/
> Kind regards,
> Damian Sawicki
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
-m 644 debian/dbus.conf
> $1/usr/share/dbus-1/system.d/dnsmasq.conf
> endef
>
> clean:
I have an idea to save that patch. It is probably thursday
when I have time to "materialize" the idea.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
_
m 644 $(MAN)/dnsmasq.8 $(DESTDIR)$(MANDIR)/man8
>
I have an idea to save that patch. It is probably thursday
when I have time to "materialize" the idea.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsm
a retransmit
- Forwarded message from Geert Stappers -
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 19:51:34 +0200
From: Geert Stappers
To: Dnsmasq Mailinglist
Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Minor typo fix in the man page
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
The manual page had "list or RR-types"
produced elsewhere.
> so it looks like some issue with the caching part of dnsmasq.
Consider to tell more about the cache usage.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
;a=commitdiff;h=416390f9962e455769aa8ab6df0e105cae07ae55;hp=24804b7431f6ace109e91876aef859a751bf3147
> It occurs a page fault in dnsmasc.c line 1050 (initialisation of
> daemon->tcp_pipes with -1).
Oops.
> Regards,
> Hartmut
Thanks for reporting.
Groeten
Geert Stapper
rface=lo
> no-dhcp-interface=eth0:1
> bind-interfaces
>
How are those solutions ( "docker" and "IP alias") started when the host
reboots. Is the %i
of https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q4/016771.html
being used?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
dcard to add them to the tag which
> would them allocate them an IP in the range above.
> But this doesn't work.
> Can you advise if what I am trying to achieve is possible please?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
Might be wrong on the correct spelling of DHCP opti
have it already planned.
>
> Will anyone else visit the conference too?
me
> Looking forward to meet anyone.
yes
> Cheers,
> Petr
>
> [1] https://fosdem.org/2023/
> [2] https://fosdem.org/2023/schedule/track/dns/
C U
Groeten
Geer
Hi,
How can I help that patches get the attention that they deserve?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 03:38:02PM +, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 07/03/2023 23:20, Clayton Craft wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 21:40:10 -0800 Clayton Craft wrote:
> > > On Fri,
ed char *inbu
>(msg_type == DHCP6REQUEST || msg_type == DHCP6RENEW || msg_type ==
> DHCP6RELEASE || msg_type == DHCP6DECLINE))
>
> {
> - outmsgtype = DHCP6REPLY;
> + ((unsigned char *)(daemon->outpacket.iov_base))[start_msg] =
> DHCP6REPLY;
Plea
section 9.6 on
> page 26:
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2132.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2132.html#page-27
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Host_Configuration_Protocol#DHCP_message_types
And programmers call them "defines".
Groeten
Geer
out to all
> nameservers.
Yes.
> Is it possible to let dnsmasq to reach out V4 nameservers if the route
> fails (no response from V6 nameservers)?
Yes-no-questions are poor discussion starters.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
_
rted from?
git clone git://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq.git
cd dnsmasq
make
git checkout -b rfc4388
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
se make it a dnsmasq thingy by reporting what works for you.
> If not, sorry for the noise.
Just transmit what you consider as a valid message
and let the recieving end decide whether it is noise.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
_
> setup. Please could you post more details of the configuration you are using
> and logs of what happens so we can try and work out what is going wrong?
Yes, interesting problem.
I do hope there will be libpcap files.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:16:37AM +0300, 0zl wrote:
> On 4/18/23 22:51, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:24:17PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > > On 18/04/2023 16:35, 0zl wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > This is an
issue, since I
> > still rely on dnsmasq's dhcp.
>
> For those Vlans set the DNS addresses to the other DNS servers.
I neither understood what original poster wants. I only did
get "simular problem in the archive". Hopefully there will be
additional information.
Gr
RECT
> > --to-port 1053
> > ip6tables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i vlanintf -p udp --dport 53 -j REDIRECT
> > --to-port 1053
> > ip6tables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i vlanintf -p tcp --dport 53 -j REDIRECT
> > --to-port 1053
> >
> > Hope that helps,
&
what dnsmasq has been logging for
> > > that exchange, to verify whether and how dnsmasq would have received
> > > those DHCPREQUESTs for renewal.
> >
> > Some good news, it turns out my firewall was dropping any incoming DHCP
> > message that was not a broadc
se open questions (avoid "get it working [yes/no]" questions)
> Please, let me know if I should give you any other information
Tell your audience what they might be missing.
Explain them the cool thing that you want, aim for common interrest.
> Thanks a lot in advance
No, not ac
an address range.
> >
> > If you let us know what you are behaviour you want, we can tell you how
> > to configure dnsmasq to get it.
> >
> What I intended to do was:
>
> domain=mydomain.com
> local=/mydomain.com/
>
> I wanted to have this be done in a si
20 reply stackoverflow.com is
151.101.193.69
| dnsmasq[315]: 86315 192.120.33.206/55020 reply stackoverflow.com is
151.101.65.69
| dnsmasq[315]: 86315 192.120.33.206/55020 reply stackoverflow.com is
151.101.129.69
| dnsmasq[315]: 86315 192.120.33.206/55020 reply stackoverflow.com is
151.101.1.69
is possib
entry on arp add/old and remove on
> > del; OR use these arp-add and arp-del actions to do the same.
>
> Replying to myself because I made a typo in this paragraph. I meant to say:
> "should I create the ARP entry on the add/old action and remove on del"
Experim
8
@@ -2248,6 +2248,7 @@ Do not respond to class CHAOS and type TXT in domain bind
queries.
Without this option being set, the cache statistics are also available in the
DNS as answers to queries of class CHAOS and type TXT in domain bind. The
domain
names are cachesize.bind, insertions.bind, evic
redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160466#c13
> >
> > On 19. 05. 23 13:40, Petr Menšík wrote:
> > > When analysing report [1] for non-responding queries over TCP, I
> > > have found forwarded TCP connections have quite high timeout. If for
> > > whatever reason the forwarder currently set as a last used forwarder
> > > is dropping packets without reject, the TCP will timeout for about
> > > 120 seconds on my system. That is way too much, I think any TCP
> > > clients will give up far before that. This is just quick workaround
> > > to improve the situation, not final fix.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160466
> > >
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
_TIMEOUT },
> { "clear-on-reload", 0, 0, LOPT_RELOAD },
> { "dhcp-ignore-names", 2, 0, LOPT_NO_NAMES },
> { "enable-tftp", 2, 0, LOPT_TFTP },
> @@ -3391,7 +3393,12 @@ static int one_opt(int option, char *arg, char
> *errstr, char *gen_err,
.168.1.2,127.0.0.1
>
> or is it:-
> listen-address=192.168.1.2
> listen-address=127.0.0.1
>
> Or will either work?
>
sudo ss -plut | grep domain
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsma
?
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Lin
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 03:43:46PM +0800, Linyih Teng wrote:
> Geert Stappers 於 2023年5月23日 週二 下午1:59寫道：
> > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 12:05:08AM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
> > > On 22/05/2023 12:18, Linyih Teng wrote:
> > > > In the manual page is written:
ething wrong?
Thing you could do, is adding a description of the problem
you are trying to solve.
Also search for XY
in https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2023q2/017067.html
> Thank you in advance.
?
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
gt; of DHCP leases, since leases can expire to be deleted by the client.
>
> Are you saying that the number of simultaneous DHCP leases increases without
> bound, or that the 513th client gets a lease? Have you checked the number of
> leases in the dnsmasq.leases file?
Original Po
this issue.
> >
> Just for pure interest, can you share what test suite are you using? Is that
> open source?
I would also like what the name of the test suite is
and under which licence it is available.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 02:20:05PM +0530, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 1:20 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:54:15AM +0530, shashikumar Shashi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Observing that dnsmasq (version 2.8
smasq offers IP from the
> vlan19 pool (the correct pool) even if vlan99 is DOWN.
> Has anyone come across such an issue?
Could be.
Most likely they tried a more recent version.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dn
SCRIPT='/etc/dhcp-script.d/10dhcpscript'
>
> root@F36-stube:~ dnsmasq --version
> Dnsmasq version 2.89 Copyright (c) 2000-2022 Simon Kelley
> ...
>
> Maybe somebody has an idea why this can happen, looking through the
> source it is not obvious and *should not happen* 8-) =
re client will release the
> previously acquired IP address on the current vlan and then try to acquire
> the IP address on the current vlan.
>
>
> Looking for your help to root cause the issue.
A few days ago there was the Monthly Posting, it ha
Hi,
Which patches got dropped (a.k.a. did not get a proper review)?
My list, by heart:
* DNS CHAOS patch by a new contributor
Any other patches that shouldn't be ignored?
That question is the reason for this email:
Raise again attention for a patch.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
(Request
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:11:32PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 11:54:31AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
} } } } dhcpcd[449]: eth0 10 second defense failed for 192.168.1.10
} } } } and slowly the LAN collapses
> > > Set static IP on the interface and do no
configuration at al.
}
That text in other words:
Share with the dnsmasq mailinglist (archive) the dnsmasq configuration.
The original problem is most likely solvable with the original dhcpcd
configuration in-place.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
_
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 11:02:49PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> On Fri, 5 May 2023 22:13:24 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 08:47:14PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > >
> > > ... The system is a Raspberry Pi running Raspbian.
> >
cpcd.conf:
>
> interface eth0
> static ip_address=192.168.1.10/24
> static routers=192.168.1.1
>
> I do not run /sbin/dhclient, only /sbin/dhcpcd and dnsmasq.
>
> Should I do anything else?
Set static IP on the interface and do not run dhcpcd.
The problem is with dhcpcd re
on "What is the server?"
and "What is the client?" what matters. We have to ask for such information
when "problems" are reported. Problems in qoutes because most reports
I have seen here are the "problems" I had in my early days with dnsmasq.
Dnsmasq does what
types
At https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2023q2/017012.html
an example how a patch should like. Generate it
with git subcommands `commit`, `format-patch` and `send-email`.
It is OK to ask additional information about that process.
> Regards
> Justin He
Groeten
Geert Stapper
The manual page had "list or RR-types",
changed it into "list of RR-types".
Reported-by: Justin
---
man/dnsmasq.8 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/man/dnsmasq.8 b/man/dnsmasq.8
index 30429df..d131bbe 100644
--- a/man/dnsmasq.8
+++ b/man/dnsmasq.8
@@ -390,7
: is there a way to stop dnsmasq from sending
> router advertisements while at the same still providing the ra-names
> functionality?
Consider to share information on the various attempts.
Regards
Geert Stappers
Not willing to answer yes-no-questions
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
and runs fine.
Yes, that makes sense.
Allow project leader Simon some time to respond.
And do know that it is OK to do follow-up messages on this.
> Best regards,
> Martin
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
gt; # "bert" another name, bertrand
> #cname=bertand,bert
>
>
> It seems that the example has a typo, i.e., it has "bertand" instead of
> "bertrand", It should say:
>
> #cname=bertrand,bert
>
Applied in commit cd4db8246e by Simon with text:
T
le/track/dns/
>
> Cheers,
> Petr
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
on't understand is that there's nothing at all in the logs about the
> failure/timeout.
Imagination is more important as knowledge--Albert Einstein
The sympthoms are that client request doesn't reach the server,
hence the report of "time out".
> Can I increase dnsmasq's log
at is actual
desired. Visit https://xyproblem.info for _why_ explaining more.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
bind is listening on eth0, but have
> the dhcp server listen on both interfaces (and more).
What has already been tried?
Advice: Tell in the reply more about the network, such as
which IP-addresses are on the network interfaces.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Sil
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:58:19AM +0100, Luigi Baldoni wrote:
> On 4 January 2024, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 08:08:46PM +0100, Luigi Baldoni wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to get rid of a second (kea) dhcp server and
> > > hopef
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:07:16PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> The manual page had "list or RR-types",
> changed it into "list of RR-types".
>
> Reported-by: Justin
> ---
> man/dnsmasq.8 | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Cheers,
> Evandro Menezes
Groeten
Geert Stappers
Doesn't know if cache hit ratio is reported to CHAOS.
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 08:47:54PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> If dnsmasq is used in DHCP-only mode, i.e. --port==0, resolv.conf is
> not used for anything. No need to set up inotify watch on it in that
> case.
> ---
> src/inotify.c | 2 +-
> src/dnsmasq.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3
A)`
> nettle_cflags = `echo $(COPTS) | $(top)/bld/pkg-wrapper HAVE_DNSSEC
> $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags 'nettle hogweed' \
> HAVE_CRYPTOHASH
> $(PKG_CONFIG) --cflags nettle \
> HAVE_NETTLEHASH
s no "add" event has happened which calls the script.
> if this is the case, can we add an "offer" action?
>
Advice: Verify the setup with another device as a RPi.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
ogle
> for clues for weeks now to little avail. If you need any more info I can
> provide it.
No, I don't need more information about this.
Possible solution to "the problem" would need a well elaborated
Wish is ., however I get
> Thanks,
Don't thank in advanche, it is
"DHCPADVERTISE", NULL, _("no addresses available"));
> + else
> + log6_packet(state, state->lease_allocate ? "DHCPREPLY" :
> "DHCPADVERTISE", NULL, _("no addresses available"));
> break;
t struct is being linked into
> the existing addr6 list in the dhcp_config before the
> validity check, it is best to defer this insertion
> until later so an invalid entry is not present, since
> the CONFIG_ADDR6 flag might not have been set yet.
That is worth its own commit.
Groeten
Gee
l.
>
> sorry test again
>
> Have difficulties to get dnsmasq list mails throught spamfilter
>
Hey Knud,
Now we are both stupid. You with your stupid tests
and I with this stupid email.
I suggest that you consider your tests completed.
Groeten
Geert S
From: Ian Dall
When a DHCP range has a mode of "static" then the pool of dynamically
allocated address is configured to be of zero size. DHCPv6 will still
respond with statically defined addresses. In these cirumstances, not
allocating an address is expected behaviour and not an error, so allow
Hello Olaf,
(Mailinglist in the Cc:)
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:59:29PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:02:53PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > The make target 'install-common' expects results from the target 'all'.
> > A 'make -j install' may fail becau
From: Brian Haley
When a new IPv6 address is being added to a dhcp_config
struct, if there is anything invalid regarding the prefix
it looks like there is a potential memory leak.
ret_err_free() should be used to free it.
Signed-off-by: Brian Haley
---
src/option.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 01:09:36PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
> Nak.
Acknowledge
--
Silence is hard to parse
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 05:03:01PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 04:43:20PM -0500, Brian Haley wrote:
> > When a new IPv6 address is being added to a dhcp_config
> > struct, if there is anything invalid regarding the prefix
> > it looks like there
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 07:29:55PM +1030, Ian Dall wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 07:13 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:53:23PM +1030, Ian Dall wrote:
> > > When a DHCP range has a mode of "static" then the pool of dynamically
> >
it appears to be gVisor compatibility
> limitation.
Advice: Do a follow-up which aims for much more common interest. Like
explaining how cool gVisor is and where to find more information about it.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to parse
__
html
and https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2024q1/017473.html
Patches being ignored happened before and most likely will happen again.
Hence my experiment with dnsmasqmlpc, dnsmasq mailing list patch
collector. https://lists.sr.ht/~stappers/d
ation. The second line is NOT needed.
The
> address=/#/0.0.0.0
is another configuration I don't get.
So I think there are two problems. One how to use # character for server.
The other one original poster having a hard time configuring dnsmasq
for their need. I hope that follow-up me
amp; I think that DDNS is,
are two different Dynamic Domain Name Servers.
> If I'm wrong and dnsmasq can be configured as a DDNS client and my google
> foo has been poo - can anyone give me a pointer to where I might find more
> information.
>
> Thanks folks and have a good Easter M
ccurately on the lan. I think DNS Update could resolve this
> problem.
And even documented in RFC 1925.
> Any thoughts on reconsidering support for this protocol in dnsmasq?
Try to express were the complexity should be.
> Or other solutions?
>
> Cheers,
some patches haven't yet
reached the "mailinglist patch collector". Such as "Fix dependency
in make install target". See email 2024-03-17.
Most likely more patches were missed / are missing
please resend them with Cc: ~stappers/dnsmasqm...@lists.sr.ht
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
From: Olaf Hering
The make target 'install-common' expects results from the target 'all'.
A 'make -j install' may fail because both targets are brought
up-to-todate in parallel. As a result the final binary will not exist at
the time 'install-common' runs, because 'all' is not yet done.
Adjust
nt to 10.0.2.1 via tun 2.
>
> I have considered running two instances (one bound to eth1 and another
> to eth2) but that duplicates setup and makes local queries across VLANs more
> complicated.
Read the dnsmasq manual and reread the dnsmasq manual.
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence is hard to
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 06:20:03AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:07:04PM -0400, Christopher Hill wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question regarding if upstream DNS forwarding can be based on the
> > source interface? Reading the manual I d
/faqs/smart-questions.html
> Server OS: Ubuntu 20.04 Server
> Client OS: Ubuntu 20.04 Desktop
>
> Aaron M Brown
> Engineering College Computing
> Desktop Administrator
> NI1013A - 419.530.8022
Groeten
Geert Stappers
P.S.
Dnsmasq tftp works for me ...
--
Silence is hard to par
> My understanding is that, in 'proxy' mode, dnsmasq will only provide PXE
> related stuff so tftp as such will never work.
>
> Can't you manage to find a way to test without 'proxy' to see how it goes?
It is something worth to explore ...
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Silence
qtype == T_A && option_bool(OPT_FILTER_A))
> + {
> + /* return a null reply */
> + ans = 1;
> + if (!dryrun)
> + log_query(F_CONFIG | F_IPV6 | F_NEG, name, , NULL);
> + break;
> + }
> +
question?
My point of view:
Each computer has a (dnsmasq) DNS entry,
the entry gets in DNS by DHCP of dnsmasq.
Regards
Geert Stappers
ADA coin wallet address
DdzFFzCqrhsmqj9cvCvEcpq7D97cqSVmKKB8wEAzyAxYP76PwhFZBi1qyz9e38heFdQ2twPhmaWusS2XogsBgz5Mx7DYxtN4W9TnPEPW
--
Silence is hard to pars
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 05:09:49PM +0100, Jesus M Diaz wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 14:54, Alex Morris wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jun 2021, at 13:42, Jesus M Diaz wrote:
> > >
> > > so, if I have two virtual computers running over the same hardware,
> > >
> >
> > ...then your hypervisor ought to
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:54:02AM +0200, Trey Sis wrote:
> On 6/14/2021 1:43, Trey Sis wrote:
> > On 6/13/2021 22:01, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
...
> > >
> > >
> > > /home/stappers/src/dnsmasq/.git/rebase-apply
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 12:53:40PM +, Brown, Aaron M. wrote:
> From: Geert Stappers ; Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 03:58
>
> > And which permissions has file 'test.txt'?
>
> The file test.txt is 755 as well.
Acknowledge
> > Please explicite that the filename is
ere?
> How can I troubleshoot?
> I have a similar dual LAN set up and it works as expected with each
> LAN only responding with its own LAN DHCP settings.
That means the "problem" is outside dnsmasq.
> Both of us are running dnsmasq-2.76-10.el7
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 09:31:21PM +0100, Nick Howitt wrote:
> On 13/05/2021 19:26, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:05:07PM +0100, Nick Howitt wrote:
> > > I am trying to help someone who has a set up with three LAN's, all on
> > >
401 - 500 of 740 matches
Mail list logo
