Hi,
The config option:
interface-name=name,interface
should in my opinion also create an record for the given interface, if a
global ipv6 address is assigned, so the name returns both A and records.
Would this be hard to do?
Thanks for the great software,
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
previous radvd installation uses:
MinRtrAdvInterval 3;
MaxRtrAdvInterval 10;
I just wanted to have a similar setup on dnsmasq, which was only possible by
patching the header file and recompiling dnsmasq.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u
to the network adaptor, otherwise dnsmasq prints out a warning that it
cannot find a valid prefix/range..
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: dnsmasq-discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as a lease time.
What there is, is preferred and valid lifetimes. What should happen is
that when old address is about to go away, the address for that prefix
on the network adaptor should have its preferred lifetime set to zero,
On 24/07/13 19:16, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as a lease
time. What there is, is preferred and valid lifetimes. What should
happen is that when old address is about to go away, the address
for that prefix on the network adaptor
testing box).
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: dnsmasq-discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk [mailto:dnsmasq-
discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Uwe Schindler
Sent
Hi,
On 24/07/13 19:16, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as a lease
time. What there is, is preferred and valid lifetimes. What
should happen is that when old address is about to go away, the
address for that prefix on the network adaptor
Hi,
On 25/07/13 11:59, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi again,
In addition, I found a relic from the time when the RA_INTERVAL value
was hardcoded into radv.c. There is still one:
Line 294: put_opt6_long(1800); /* lifetime - twice RA retransmit */
Should be: put_opt6_long(RA_INTERVAL * 2
would
provide support for this). Radvd does it - see DeprecatePrefix options in radvd.
Uwe
On 24/07/13 19:16, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi,
RA's are not the same as DHCP, there's no such thing as a lease
time. What there is, is preferred and valid lifetimes. What
should happen
will appear later.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Simon Kelley [mailto:si...@thekelleys.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 3:03 PM
To: Uwe Schindler
Cc: dnsmasq-discuss
deprecated, so
all is fine now.
One thing I found in my investigations: The lifetime given in the dhcp-range
for IPv6 oly affects the RAs, but not the time for refreshing the DHCP
information request. I had to set it explicitely as dhcp-option6.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D
.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: dnsmasq-discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk [mailto:dnsmasq-
discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Uwe Schindler
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013
. If it is explicitely given, of course use the information from
option6:information-refresh-time setting.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Simon Kelley [mailto:si...@thekelleys.org.uk]
Sent
Hi,
Regarding the Android-Bug: I found out that I still have to enable
the fast mode (which is only done in the first minute after a
config change). The reason is: Although the prefix has a lifetime of
86400 on my dhcp-range, in contrast, the router itself gets a
lifetime of 1800
Hi,
I found the reason for this bug:
One small thing with your new code - maybe a bug, because the comment
says something else: Although the configured (in my config) valid_lifetime of
the prefix is now lower
(30 mins on my machine), after deprecation it raises the valid_lifetime again
up
Hi Simon,
I did a git pull yesterday evening and problem was already fixed. Many thanks!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Simon Kelley [mailto:si...@thekelleys.org.uk]
Sent: Monday
Hi Simon,
I want to try and avoid making every parameter changable, like Radv
does. Who can tell what the parameters should be. A flag which says
stay in fast retransmit mode to fix buggy android seems much more
sensible.
That is perfectly fine! So a boolean option to work around the
Hi,
I don’t think this should be fixed at all, because it violates the „official“
format of resolv.conf, see man page. A resolv.conf file modifies like this
could not be read by libc’s resolver functions.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http
, they have to fix this, too - but it is out of
your control.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: dnsmasq-discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk [mailto:dnsmasq-
discuss-boun
Hi Harald,
Dnsmasq does the check which the standards require, which is to send
an ICMP ping (echo request) to the address it's about to allocate. The
fact that the client doesn't respond would seem to indicate that the
clients are NOT using IP addresses after the lease has expired.
g, connect with that IPv4-only
SSID.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Dnsmasq-discuss [mailto:dnsmasq-discuss-
> boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of ?
> Sen
is is another one where dnssec fails, so clearly a
bug.
There is a test page about exactly that case, which fails for me when resolving
through dnsmasq: http://0skar.cz/dns/en/
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
Please note:
I fixed the example domain to have a real A record. Try any other fake name
instead:
e.g., "dummy.pangaea.de", also referring to wildcard domain.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Ori
an
inform us which commit fixed this issue.
Thanks for the quick reply!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant [mailto:ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk]
> Se
Hi,
Was there a change in dnsmasq related to this? Would be good to get some
feedback. I'll try this version now. Currently I am running 2.75 (Debian
testing pkg 2.75-1)
Do you have dnssec enabled?
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u
Hi,
I'll try. Unfortunately I have to provoke the spinning somehow. I just
installed the test version, was happy, and a few minutes back it was no longer
responding. TOP showed 99% CPU.
By the way, box is a VIA C7 standard x86 box (32 bits), not MIPS like Kevin's.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H
Hi,
ALARM: I compiled "2.76test3" and now it is spinning with 100% CPU on my box,
box responds slow or not at all on DNS query. Was the fix included in "test3"?
I updated from 2.75 to 2.76test3 because of the previously mentioned wildcard
dnssec issue.
Uwe
-
Uwe S
t,
> I can validate everything that Google DNS validates.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon.
>
>
>
> On 04/01/16 14:48, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found out that resolving of DNSSEC signed wildcard domains does
> > not work correctly with d
), but it talked about CNAME's which were not used here.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Dnsmasq-discuss [mailto:dnsmasq-discuss-
> boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Sim
Hi,
Grabbed, compiled, and installed it. I'll report back. It is now in use on my
router, so I'll see if anything like this happens again.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From:
Hi Simon,
> > Well, that's the smoking gun. Dnsmasq is doing the right thing, and your
> > upstream server at 212.202.215.1 is broken. I realise that doesn't solve
> > the problem, but at least you know where to work now :)
> >
> >
> > (the reason dnsmasq is returning SERVFAIL is that there's a
>
Hi Simon,
> Well, that's the smoking gun. Dnsmasq is doing the right thing, and your
> upstream server at 212.202.215.1 is broken. I realise that doesn't solve
> the problem, but at least you know where to work now :)
>
>
> (the reason dnsmasq is returning SERVFAIL is that there's a
>
request only).
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Dnsmasq-discuss [mailto:dnsmasq-discuss-
> boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Pali Rohár
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2
Hi,
> > Windows hosts generally have 2 problems, so assigning a DNS name with
> > IPv6 address using "ra-names" only works under the following
> > circumstances:
> >
> > - The Windows firewall must allow ICMP Echo (PING) requests to go
> > through (IPv6). And here comes the problem: By default
tion helps,
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Dnsmasq-discuss [mailto:dnsmasq-discuss-
> boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk] On Behalf Of Robert N
> Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2017
; ra-param=*,high,60,0
>>>
>>> I changed the ra-param in an attempt to bypass the routers' RA.
>>>
>>> Option6 is working as expected.
>>>
>>> Any ideas, or am I just looking at a pipe dream (wanting host names
>in
>>> the pi-hole query log, ins
Hey,
> > The question is, should the above configuration be "baked in" to the code?
>
> As I understand, this vulnerability arises from the Web Proxy Automatic
> Discovery (WPAD) protocol, not from dnsmasq itself. And, dnsmasq
> configuration provides - or will provide - a configuration
ime. E.g., if router
advertisements last a maximum time of 30 minutes, also set the lease time to 30
minutes for IPv6. This requires clients to renew more often, but the change
gots faster. If you force the router to disconnect during nights at a fixed
time, the effect won't be so large.
Uwe
-
Uwe Sch
in the
debian package to have the correct path in the default file (instead of
%%PREFIX%%). This looks like a bug in the debian package installer.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: D
. If you want “.ncp” your preferred domain, set “domain = ncp” and
only keep the first entry.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Dnsmasq-discuss On
Behalf Of Sean Warner
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 2:25 AM
-interfaces) option.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
<https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Dnsmasq-discuss On
Behalf Of Koos Pol
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2019 9:11 AM
To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
S
Hi,
> thanks for the elaborate reply!
No problem!
> There's a slightly more special case for us: We have one central firewall
> (which
> gets the full /56 net on the upstream interface routed to it) and most
> gateways
> are separate nodes
> (i.e. most VLANs are not connected to the central
Hi
> I have a setup in mind and wonder whether dnsmasq is the correct tool (since I
> have not found the necessary functionality in the documentation yet).
>
> We have a /56 IPv6 network, and plan to use pure DHCPv6 (no stateless
> autoconfiguration) in several /64 networks.
That's perfect.
Hi,
although this is no longer fully related to dnsmasq, just a few sentences on
top:
> >> There's a slightly more special case for us: We have one central firewall
> (which
> >> gets the full /56 net on the upstream interface routed to it) and most
> gateways
> >> are separate nodes
> >> (i.e.
ilman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail:u...@thetaphi.de
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
cuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-disc
search zbmc.eu
Which is a bit odd since I don't have resolvconf.
The system works OK, DNS works, but I'd like to know how.
--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
___
Dnsmasq-discus
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search zbmc.eu
Which is a bit odd since I don't have resolvconf.
The system works OK, DNS works, but I'd like to know how.
--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
___
Dnsmasq-
48 matches
Mail list logo
