Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq always answer dhcp NAK

2017-01-21 Thread Nikita N.
sq answers NAK. Hope that clarifies, thanks -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com On Sat, Jan 21, 2017, at 12:37 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi again Nikita, > > Le Sat, 21 Jan 2017 00:19:02 -0800 > "Nikita N." a écrit: > > > Hi, > > yes indeed, we are faci

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq always answer dhcp NAK

2017-01-21 Thread Nikita N.
can suggest? Thanks -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com On Fri, Jan 20, 2017, at 11:58 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi again Nikita, > > Le Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:37:43 -0800 > "Nikita N." a écrit: > > > Hi, > > I confirm --dhcp-authoritative works *PERFECTLY*

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq always answer dhcp NAK

2017-01-21 Thread Nikita N.
*NOT* protocol/standard valid, then dnsmasq sends a DHCP NAK with Dst: macX (e.g. similar to the different cases when dnsmasq sends NAK with option Message wrong network, whatever) Is that possible? Thanks -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com On Fri, Jan 20, 2017, at 02:55 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq always answer dhcp NAK

2017-01-20 Thread Nikita N.
ds a DHCP Answer NAK with Dst:correct_mac_aa:bb:cc (and possibly also ip Dst:1.2.3.4 whatever) How can I set this? Thanks -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com On Fri, Jan 20, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:20:17 -0800 > "Nikita N." a écrit:

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq always answer dhcp NAK

2017-01-20 Thread Nikita N.
them allright. Hope that helps to understand my (nasty) problem. Thanks -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com On Fri, Jan 20, 2017, at 01:24 PM, Nikita N. wrote: > Hi Albert, > thank you for your answer, but my config already has > --dhcp-authoritative. > I will try to explain th

[Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq always answer dhcp NAK

2017-01-20 Thread Nikita N.
: unfortunately when that happens the client hangs forever waiting for the DHCP answer (only workaround is reboot). Now, I want to force dnsmasq to answer NAK to every wrong/bugged DHCP request incoming (instead of keeping silent). Thanks. -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com -- http://www.fastmail.com

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS - ICMP - Destination unreachable (Port unreachable) ?

2015-05-13 Thread Nikita N.
NS query? And I will receive a TCP frame from Dnsmasq with the DNS query response? -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com On Wed, May 13, 2015, at 12:43 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Nikita, > > Le Tue, 12 May 2015 23:49:55 -0700, "Nikita N." > a écrit : > > > Hi S

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS - ICMP - Destination unreachable (Port unreachable) ?

2015-05-13 Thread Nikita N.
fferent machines, loopback is not possible, why I can't see neither the UDP/ICMP answer back, nor the query? How would I set Wireshark, to sniff out those 2 mysterious UDP frame? -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com On Tue, May 12, 2015, at 02:22 PM, Simon Kelley wrote: > The mo

[Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS - ICMP - Destination unreachable (Port unreachable) ?

2015-05-12 Thread Nikita N.
se ICMP are from, and/what are their purpose. Maybe are generated by Dnsmasq, as some kind of alternate DNS response? Maybe are generated by gateway linux kernel, as some kind of standard behavior? Maybe are generated by the client software/web browser? Thanks -- Nikita N. niki...@operamail.com --

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-broadcast & not

2014-02-21 Thread Nikita N.
> All the clients are quite common, and in use all around the world, if > there was a general problem with this, we'd probably have heard about it > by now. Hi, well you are hearing it now :) > It seems likely that the problem is something in your network, rather > than the DHCP clients or ser

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-broadcast & not

2014-02-20 Thread Nikita N.
Hi, sorry but didnt get the feedback for my query. Maybe you Simon can you give me a hint? Thanks On Sat, Feb 15, 2014, at 06:36 AM, Nikita N. wrote: > Hi All :) > long time ago I shared with you an issue regarding dnsmasq used on > wireless nets. > Finally I believe I found a possib

[Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-broadcast & not

2014-02-15 Thread Nikita N.
Hi All :) long time ago I shared with you an issue regarding dnsmasq used on wireless nets. Finally I believe I found a possible cause for that. By now I have been testing using many different devices and Os, windows clients, linux, android, windows phones, and so on. Well, what I found is that, th

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Redirect internal non existent hosts

2014-01-15 Thread Nikita N.
Hi Robert, if that can be of help, Im doing like that in my dnsmasq.conf [...] address=/mysite1.mydomain.com/192.168.0.2 address=/mysite2.mydomain.com/192.168.0.3 address=/#/192.168.0.1 [...] if its not mysite1 or mysite2, all the rest goes to 192.168.0.1 :) Regards, On Wed, Jan 15, 2014, at 09:35

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DHCP over a wireless bridge

2014-01-08 Thread Nikita N.
Hi Albert :) you didnt mention last time you had a wifi based configuration too, nice to know! :) To answer John, if I can try to help, yes, your requirement looks little unclear to me too.. FYI, Im "playing" too with a wifi loopback bridge project, and its indeed not very easy to implement from sc

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ARP ignores DHCP ACKs !

2013-12-25 Thread Nikita N.
Hi Albert :) > > Still, would like to ask you about ICMP frames, if I can.. ;) > > because you say client uses ARP, the GW uses ICMP.. right? > > Not the gateway, the DHCP server (which may or may not be a gateway). Yes yes, I run on 1 Linux machine, it does all, gw and dnsmasq (dns+dhcp). Then

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ARP ignores DHCP ACKs !

2013-12-25 Thread Nikita N.
> The important point for your situation is that it's perfectly normal to > see a DHCP client make an ARP request as part of the address-aquisition > process, and for that ARP request to go un-answered. Hi Simon :) Yes, that I understood very clearly, such unanswered ARPs are normal, everybody t

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ARP ignores DHCP ACKs !

2013-12-24 Thread Nikita N.
Tue, Dec 24, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 24/12/13 12:35, Nikita N. wrote: > > Hi :) Im having a strange issue here with DHCP/ARP I cant solve.. > > DHCP works good, it receives a REQ from client MAC asking the preferred > > ip, e.g. 192.168.0.10, and DHCP answers

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ARP ignores DHCP ACKs !

2013-12-24 Thread Nikita N.
client is Windows7.. when client is Linux, Win Xp or Vista, all goes nice.. im still trying more scenarios, but Im sure about that: im stuck on Win7.. On Tue, Dec 24, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 24/12/13 12:35, Nikita N. wrote: > > Hi :) Im having a strange issue here w

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] ARP ignores DHCP ACKs !

2013-12-24 Thread Nikita N.
is a > time-out issue. > > I have not tried --no-ping on dnsmasq. > > Jim A. > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Matthias Andree > wrote: > > Am 24.12.2013 13:35, schrieb Nikita N.: > >> Hi :) Im having a strange issue here with DHCP/ARP I cant solve.

[Dnsmasq-discuss] ARP ignores DHCP ACKs !

2013-12-24 Thread Nikita N.
Hi :) Im having a strange issue here with DHCP/ARP I cant solve.. DHCP works good, it receives a REQ from client MAC asking the preferred ip, e.g. 192.168.0.10, and DHCP answers correctly ACK.. But after that, my client keeps asking the following ARP requests to broadcast: "Who has 192.168.0.10? Te

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Ping does not work but nslookup works (Use dnsmasq on Mac OS X)

2013-12-23 Thread Nikita N.
.. btw of log facility, if I can give a suggestion.. would be nice to make it more verbose.. eg. when some behavioral exception is taken, eg. frame comes and some action should be taken, but it is NOT taken (or vice) .. a message would be nice, the user will understand whats going on.. typical my e

[Dnsmasq-discuss] LLMNR?

2013-12-20 Thread Nikita N.
Hi :) I searched the man page but didnt find any mention to LLMNR.. my Windows7 client keeps sending queries to LLMNR, but they all stay unanswered.. I dont have others dns servers, Im in the "authoritative" case. So wanted to ask, how can I configure dnsmasq to answer also LLMNR queries ( 224.0.0.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] address=/#/192.168.0.1 - does not work!

2013-12-09 Thread Nikita N.
Sorry sorry, it works it works :) I was looking at an old trace, apologies.. Going to trash dhcpd and that dirty disgusting wtf dnsspoof.. ;) Thanks and keep on the good work! :D On Mon, Dec 9, 2013, at 03:01 PM, Nikita N. wrote: > Yes, it did the trick, worked at first shot :) > Still r

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] address=/#/192.168.0.1 - does not work!

2013-12-09 Thread Nikita N.
Yes, it did the trick, worked at first shot :) Still remains that "silence" after DHCP "requests" without previous "discover".. really unpleasant.. Probably its not 100% protocol compliant, but I see also from dhcpd, its common behaviour to accept DHCP requests from "returning" clients.. Maybe impl

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] address=/#/192.168.0.1 - does not work!

2013-12-09 Thread Nikita N.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013, at 04:59 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Mostly the DNS feature half-hour-delayed disappointed me enough.. > > So my question is directed to the author of dnsmasq - I still dont know, > > can I use dnsmasq for my needs? or im just wasting time? > > Thanks :) > > AFAICT, yes, yo

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] address=/#/192.168.0.1 - does not work!

2013-12-09 Thread Nikita N.
, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 09/12/2013 12:26, Nikita N. a écrit : > > Hi Albert :) I see you want a complete log/trace session for your > > debugging, isnt it? :) > > *My* debugging? No. I don't intend to debu your issue, only have a look > at it and see if, as a user

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] address=/#/192.168.0.1 - does not work!

2013-12-09 Thread Nikita N.
gt; Le 09/12/2013 11:50, Nikita N. a écrit : > > Hi Albert :) what I wrote you is what in fact I *see* from Wireshark. > > I see all traffic there, I see exactly when and where appears the frame > > into at0, the DHCP and DNS request frames from me, the correct answers > &g

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] address=/#/192.168.0.1 - does not work!

2013-12-09 Thread Nikita N.
013, at 02:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 09/12/2013 09:29, Nikita N. a écrit : > > Hi All, its the first time for me on this maillist :) > > > > Im trying some tests with dnsmasq, but I cant make it work.. sorry :( > > I dont know if its a bug.. or its just me missi

[Dnsmasq-discuss] address=/#/192.168.0.1 - does not work!

2013-12-09 Thread Nikita N.
Hi All, its the first time for me on this maillist :) Im trying some tests with dnsmasq, but I cant make it work.. sorry :( I dont know if its a bug.. or its just me missing something.. So here what I want to do: I created a tap ethernet interface (on wireless, because I have only that, but thats