On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:16:43PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2020 23:08:32 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 17 December 2018 18:41:09 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have not got any reply about this patch for years.
>
> So I would like to know, is some spam f
Hello!
I have not got any reply about this patch for years.
So I would like to know, is some spam filter eating my emails and
therefore patch was not delivered?
Can somebody confirm if Simon got my patch or should I probably resent
it from different email address, to prevent spam filter problems
Hello Simon!
Could you please review / comment this patch?
I would like to know what is needed to be fixed or changed, so patch
could be finally merged.
On Monday 17 December 2018 18:41:09 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Currently IPv6 addresses are assigned to tuple (IAID, DUID). When system
> changes IAID
Hello!
Today this patch celebrates one year anniversary.
Based on the fact that there was no reported problem for this patch for
one year and also more people tested it and use it in production systems,
could be this patch included it into dnsmasq project?
Or is something else needed?
On Monday
On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 10:35 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:12:00PM +0100, Harald Jensås wrote:
> > Bumping this patch again:
> > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q4/012707.html
> >
> > I see there have been several request to include this on
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:12:00PM +0100, Harald Jensås wrote:
> Bumping this patch again:
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q4/012707.html
>
> I see there have been several request to include this on the list:
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discus
Bumping this patch again:
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q4/012707.html
I see there have been several request to include this on the list:
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2019q1/012895.html
(and others ...) afaict there has not been any obje
On 26/06/2019 21:16, Oliver Freyermuth wrote:
Am 26.06.19 um 21:49 schrieb Pali Rohár:
So, could somebody review and comment my patch?
Just to add on this:
I'm also using this patch in production since over a month now and it works
very well for me (with dnsmasq 2.80).
Would really love to se
Am 26.06.19 um 21:49 schrieb Pali Rohár:
> On Saturday 11 May 2019 17:42:54 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
>>> On 6 Apr 2019, at 12:01, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:02:20AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2019 13:41:43 Geert Stappers wrote:
> On
On Saturday 11 May 2019 17:42:54 Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> > On 6 Apr 2019, at 12:01, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:02:20AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 12 February 2019 13:41:43 Geert Stappers wrote:
> >>> On 06-02-2019 21:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>>
Am 14.05.19 um 17:52 schrieb Roy Marples:
> On 14/05/2019 14:29, Oliver Freyermuth wrote:
>> Same here. In an automated deployment situation, client changes DUID in each
>> phase:
>> - PXE (if done via IPv6)
>> - Installation time (from ramdisk)
>> - Final OS after installation
>> This may improve
On 14/05/2019 14:29, Oliver Freyermuth wrote:
Same here. In an automated deployment situation, client changes DUID in each
phase:
- PXE (if done via IPv6)
- Installation time (from ramdisk)
- Final OS after installation
This may improve if newer versions of dhcpcd get packaged in installer ramdi
Am 11.05.19 um 19:42 schrieb Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant:
>
>
>> On 6 Apr 2019, at 12:01, Geert Stappers wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:02:20AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 12 February 2019 13:41:43 Geert Stappers wrote:
On 06-02-2019 21:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday
> On 6 Apr 2019, at 12:01, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:02:20AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> On Tuesday 12 February 2019 13:41:43 Geert Stappers wrote:
>>> On 06-02-2019 21:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 11 January 2019 17:52:43 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 17
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:02:20AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2019 13:41:43 Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On 06-02-2019 21:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Friday 11 January 2019 17:52:43 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >> On Monday 17 December 2018 18:41:09 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >>> Current
Hello, can somebody review this patch?
On Tuesday 12 February 2019 13:41:43 Geert Stappers wrote:
> Another request for
>
> Hey, could this patch get reviewed?
>
>
> On 06-02-2019 21:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > PING
> >
> > On Friday 11 January 2019 17:52:43 Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> Hello, can some
Another request for
Hey, could this patch get reviewed?
On 06-02-2019 21:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
> PING
>
> On Friday 11 January 2019 17:52:43 Pali Rohár wrote:
>> Hello, can somebody look at this patch?
>>
>> I remember that more people asked for ability to assign IPv6 address
>> based on MAC add
PING
On Friday 11 January 2019 17:52:43 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello, can somebody look at this patch?
>
> I remember that more people asked for ability to assign IPv6 address
> based on MAC address specified in config file, rather then IAID/DUID.
>
> On Monday 17 December 2018 18:41:09 Pali Rohár
On Sunday 13 January 2019 09:11:27 Roy Marples wrote:
> On 11/01/2019 16:52, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello, can somebody look at this patch?
> >
> > I remember that more people asked for ability to assign IPv6 address
> > based on MAC address specified in config file, rather then IAID/DUID.
>
> ...
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 09:11:27AM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> On 11/01/2019 16:52, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello, can somebody look at this patch?
> >
> > I remember that more people asked for ability to assign IPv6 address
> > based on MAC address specified in config file, rather then IAID/DUID.
>
On 11/01/2019 16:52, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello, can somebody look at this patch?
I remember that more people asked for ability to assign IPv6 address
based on MAC address specified in config file, rather then IAID/DUID.
...
Also this patch adds support for allowing IPv6 address to be associate
Hello, can somebody look at this patch?
I remember that more people asked for ability to assign IPv6 address
based on MAC address specified in config file, rather then IAID/DUID.
On Monday 17 December 2018 18:41:09 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Currently IPv6 addresses are assigned to tuple (IAID, DUID). W
22 matches
Mail list logo
