On 05/06/2014 10:18 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
I think not picking up this work will result in implementation and operational
problems.
Those of us who still have the vomity taste would like the problems with
interop and implementation to continue.
Just because we _can_ make something work
On 6 May 2014, at 13:27, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 05/06/2014 10:18 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
I think not picking up this work will result in implementation and
operational problems.
Those of us who still have the vomity taste would like the problems with
interop and
On May 6, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
On 6 May 2014, at 13:27, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 05/06/2014 10:18 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
I think not picking up this work will result in implementation and
operational problems.
Those of us who still have the
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Joe Abley wrote:
I think dnsop should pick up some or all of this work. I think not picking up
this work will result in implementation and operational problems. (I am
reminded of the consequences of not standardising NAT, for example.)
I would be happy to contribute
Moin!
On 06 May 2014, at 19:18, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
Google DNS supports edns-client-subnet, which by recent GIH+GGM count means
10%+ of all client queries now trigger queries to authority servers with that
option included.
On the authority side, support for this option has
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
On the authority side, support for this option has a potential impact on
query load. On the recursive side, support for this option has a potential
impact on cache size.
Just to add some limited data; CloudFront (a large
Section 3.1.1. Responses Tailored to the Originator in the
draft-iab-dns-applications-07
has some related discussion to this topic.
From the IAB draft, it seems that IAB does not prefer to tailor dns response
based on the originator.
Jiankang Yao
From: Joe Abley
Date: 2014-05-07 01:18
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Jiankang Yao ya...@cnnic.cn wrote:
Section
3.1.1http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-dns-applications-07#section-3.1.1.
Responses Tailored to the Originator in the draft-iab-dns-applications-07
has some related discussion to this topic.
From the IAB draft,
One view about this issue based on the previous discussion years ago is that
the dns implementors may choose to tailor the dns response in their own way,
but ietf is unlikely to standardize it.
Jiankang Yao
From: Colm MacCárthaigh
Date: 2014-05-07 09:14
To: yaojk
CC: Joe Abley; dnsop
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : Add 100.64.0.0/10 prefixes to IPv4 Locally-Served DNS
Zones Registry.
Author :
On 05/06/2014 10:30 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 6 May 2014, at 13:27, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 05/06/2014 10:18 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
I think not picking up this work will result in implementation and operational
problems.
Those of us who still have the vomity taste would like
Tencent has been supporting edns client subnet for nearly a year . On the
authority side , we benifit so much from ECS for the extra accuracy of user
geo-location identification ,which helps a lot for our users' network access
optimization and our access traffic scheduling at a totally
12 matches
Mail list logo
