On 6.2.2018 17:13, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 6 Feb 2018, at 8:04, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
>> On 6.2.2018 13:22, Tony Finch wrote:
>>> A. Schulze wrote:
Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-" is more descriptive and specific.
I also prefer that longer variant.
>>>
On 6 Feb 2018, at 8:31, Joe Abley wrote:
Some other RFC numbers were clearly reserved for specific documents in
the past (e.g. see RFC 2821/2, obsoleting RFC 821/2) but perhaps those
were special cases.
It was special, and very much regretted by the RFC Editor at the time.
This badly
On 6 Feb 2018, at 11:04, Petr Špaček wrote:
> On 6.2.2018 13:22, Tony Finch wrote:
>> A. Schulze wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-" is more descriptive and specific.
>>> I also prefer that longer variant.
>>
>> Yes, more friendly for
On 2/6/18 8:13 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 6 Feb 2018, at 8:04, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
>> On 6.2.2018 13:22, Tony Finch wrote:
>>> A. Schulze wrote:
Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-" is more descriptive and specific.
I also prefer that longer variant.
>>>
On 6 Feb 2018, at 8:04, Petr Špaček wrote:
On 6.2.2018 13:22, Tony Finch wrote:
A. Schulze wrote:
Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-" is more descriptive and specific.
I also prefer that longer variant.
Yes, more friendly for web searches if someone is wondering
On 6.2.2018 13:22, Tony Finch wrote:
> A. Schulze wrote:
>>
>> Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-" is more descriptive and specific.
>> I also prefer that longer variant.
>
> Yes, more friendly for web searches if someone is wondering about weird
> queries.
Bonus points
On 2018-02-05 14:18 -0500, Geoff Huston wrote:
> I thought this was due to some concern over the wording in RFC (some
> IDN
> RFC whose number I can’t recall right now!) over a comment that the UC label
> should not contain the starting sequence " - -”
RFC5890 point 2.3.1
To facilitate
A. Schulze wrote:
>
> Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-" is more descriptive and specific.
> I also prefer that longer variant.
Yes, more friendly for web searches if someone is wondering about weird
queries.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch http://dotat.at/
Paul Hoffman:
I think Tony's idea is likely fine, but I also think
kskroll-sentinel-is-ta- is perfectly fine as well.
Yes, "kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-" is more descriptive and specific.
I also prefer that longer variant.
Andreas
___
DNSOP