Meral, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 1:38 AM, Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team
Elwyn, thanks for your review. Duane, thanks for your response. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Sep 14, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Wessels, Duane
> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why received messages in this thread are being truncated. The
> archive
> has my full response here:
>
>
Joel, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Mar 18, 2020, at 4:06 PM, Joel Halpern via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART)
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Pete, thanks for your review. Shumon, thanks for your response. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 6:44 PM, Shumon Huque wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 PM Pete Resnick via Datatracker
> mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote:
> Document:
Jouni, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Jan 21, 2020, at 4:03 PM, Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART)
Ines, thanks for your review. All, thanks for your responses. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Mar 2, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Ines Robles
> wrote:
>
> Hi Warren,
>
> Thank you very much for your reply,
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ines..
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 8:18 PM Warren Kumari
Brian, thanks for your review. Puneet, thanks for your response and for
updating the draft accordingly. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:20 PM, Puneet Sood
> wrote:
>
> NOTE: Responding to the TTL concerns raised in multiple threads
> (thanks Viktor Dukhovni,
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-02: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-01: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Peter, thanks for your review. I entered a Yes ballot and pointed to your
review.
Alissa
> On Apr 6, 2019, at 5:16 AM, Peter Yee via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Peter Yee
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
> On Nov 21, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Sara Dickinson wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 21 Nov 2018, at 10:58, Alissa Cooper > <mailto:ali...@cooperw.in>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 9:01 PM, Joe Abley >> <mailto:jab...@hopcount.
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 9:01 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> Hi Alissa!
>
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 20:18, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
>> I support Benjamin's first DISCUSS point. In addition to documenting the
>> privacy considerations, I think it's important for this docum
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Thanks, glad there wasn’t a thread that I missed. Given Warren’s quick progress
on this I suspect there is not any value for me to respond further to your
points below.
Alissa
> On Oct 19, 2018, at 11:52 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> On 10/19/2018 3:05 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
Hi Dave,
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 9:26 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>> On 10/18/2018 12:04 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> Dave has stated that he is unwilling to do this work. Instead of having the
>> WG document simply stall, Benno and I have agreed that we would split them
>> between us. If anyone
Hi Dave,
> On Oct 10, 2018, at 2:32 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2018 10:52 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> I think this document needs to state explicitly which updates apply to which
>> existing RFCs. That is, I would expect to see in sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3
Hi Dave,
> On Oct 10, 2018, at 12:49 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2018 10:03 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> I agree with Alexey. It seems like the expert is being asked to do the review
>> that IANA would typically do itself.
>
> Point taken. However, th
Francesa, thanks for your review. Dave, thanks for your responses. I entered a
DISCUSS ballot based on the issue raised about unused citations.
Typically the abstract does contain an explanation of the document(s) being
updated. In this case the list is so long that I’m not sure it’s worth it.
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Thank you Dan. I have entered a No Objection ballot and requested responses to
your comments.
Alissa
> On Sep 14, 2018, at 1:29 AM, Dan Romascanu wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>
Jari, thank you for your review. Geoff, thanks for your responses. I have
entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Aug 30, 2018, at 10:10 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
> Thanks for the responses, Geoff.
>
> One minor follow-up:
>
>> The final point I am not so convinced about. The reason is
Joel, thanks for your reviews of this document. Authors/WG, thanks for
addressing Joel’s comments. I have entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 11:40 PM, Joel Halpern wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Joel, thank you for your review. I have balloted No Objection.
Alissa
> On Apr 30, 2017, at 10:44 PM, Joel Halpern wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03: No Record
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
Hi Donald and Mark,
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 5:28 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alissa,
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote:
>>
>> In message <20160120001031.9209.94235.idtrac...@ietfa.amsl.com>
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-09: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
> On Aug 31, 2015, at 5:11 PM, joel jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/31/15 1:04 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
>> I agree with Alvaro and Stephen's comments. In particular, to my eye
>> [tor-rendezvous] should be a normative reference given item #3 in Sectio
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
Reflecting on something Rob said in yesterday's meeting, I think the
way that choice is dealt with in draft-livingood-dns-redirect could be
improved. Whether subscribers are opting in to DNS redirection or not
obviously has a huge impact on how the practice is judged.
In the current draft,
37 matches
Mail list logo