On 22 Mar 2010, at 19:30, Alfred HÎnes wrote:
I do think that it belongs in dnsext rather than dnsop - did you
decide to move based on feedback from the working group chairs?
Shane,
at least _my_ argument was an encouragement to consider whether
(or not) the underlying problem could/should
Dear all,
This draft is moved from the next door with some improvements suggested by Joe
Abley etc.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-dns-newzone-notify-00.txt
Thank you.
2010-03-22
Cindy Wang
DNS Lab, CNNIC Labs
China INterent Network Information Center (CNNIC)
Phone: 8610-58813074
Email:
Cindy,
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 21:16 +0800, Cindy Wang wrote:
This draft is moved from the next door with some improvements suggested by
Joe Abley etc.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-wang-dns-newzone-notify-00.txt
In general I support this effort (although I haven't read the newest
draft... a
I do think that it belongs in dnsext rather than dnsop - did you
decide to move based on feedback from the working group chairs?
Shane,
at least _my_ argument was an encouragement to consider whether
(or not) the underlying problem could/should be better addressed
under the umbrella of the
