Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions-04.txt

2017-09-20 Thread Jiankang Yao
Dear Richard Gibson, Thanks a lot for your kind review and questions. some comments are below inline. Jiankang Yao From: Richard Gibson Date: 2017-09-19 10:48 To: dnsop Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions-04.txt I have some questions about this

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-song-atr-large-resp-00.txt

2017-09-20 Thread william manning
i think this is a worthy document for consideration. /Wm On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Davey Song wrote: > Hi folks, > > I just submit a draft dealing with issue of large DNS response especially > in IPv6. Commnets are welcome. > > If chairs think it is in the scope

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost

2017-09-20 Thread =JeffH
> This starts a formal Call for Adoption for > draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost > > The draft is available here: > > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for > adoption by DNSOP, and comments

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions-04.txt

2017-09-20 Thread Richard Gibson
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Jiankang Yao wrote: > *From:* Richard Gibson > *Date:* 2017-09-19 10:48 > *To:* dnsop > *Subject:* Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying- > questions-04.txt > In a more general sense, how are

[DNSOP] 答复: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-song-atr-large-resp-00.txt

2017-09-20 Thread 宋林健
Thank you. The large DNS response in IPv6 is a real problem. ATR is one option to adopted in authoritative server alone. If someone or party have more influence on both resolver and authoritative side (cloud and app provider who can choose their own DNS resolution path), Mukund’s

Re: [DNSOP] Definition of QNAME (Was: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-06.txt

2017-09-20 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Hi, The conversation on QNAME went quiet some time ago, so I thought it might be a good time to send a proposal about what to say about this term. I haven't passed this by my co-editors, since it seems like we're going all to need to discuss anyway. Here's the old text: QNAME The most

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost

2017-09-20 Thread Wendy Seltzer
>From a W3C perspective, and for the further specification of components of the web security model, it would be helpful to have this behavior of the loopback interface specified. I support adoption and will be willing to review text. Thanks, --Wendy On 09/06/2017 10:00 AM, tjw ietf wrote: >

Re: [DNSOP] 答复: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-song-atr-large-resp-00.txt

2017-09-20 Thread Paul Vixie
Davey Song(宋林健) wrote: Thank you. The large DNS response in IPv6 is a real problem. ATR is one option to adopted in authoritative server alone. If someone or party have more influence on both resolver and authoritative side (cloud and app provider who can choose their own DNS resolution