At Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:53:04 +0200,
bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote:
The post is currently short on details for Solaris and Windows. If you have
clues, please share!
As far as I know Windows doesn't support RFC 3542.
---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 08:57:59AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
I did not know about __APPLE_USE_RFC_3542, which I've just added to my tree.
It tells the compiler which version of the advanced API to use as
of Lion from memory. You also have similar magic on Linux as the
advanced socket API
More ideas and comments would be greatly apprecitated as I want to upload a new
version of my draft RFC in which I will incorporate applicable comments.
-Original Message-
From: Rafiee, Hosnieh
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 9:28 AM
To: 'Mark Andrews'
Cc: dns...@ietf.org
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08-10-12 22:34, Tony Finch wrote:
On 8 Oct 2012, at 16:08, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
Does this affect draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis (currently in the
RFC Editor queue)?
It's section on change-of-operator was added in revision -03 dated
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Antoin Verschuren
antoin.verschu...@sidn.nl wrote:
So enough prior art.
Question is more if we need action and if so what.
I don't have any knowledge about the US patent system, or any patent
system as a matter of fact.
perhaps the questions to ask are:
1)
Please review draft-andrews-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303
Abstract
[RFC6598] specified that: reverse DNS queries for 100.64/10 MUST NOT
be forwarded to the global DNS infrastructure.
This document formally requests that IANA add the associated zones to
the Locally-Served DNS Zones
