Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-10 Thread Peter Desjardins
I think you mentioned exploring HTML+CSS for print a few days ago. Is that because FO might be at the end of it's road? Thanks! Peter On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Norman Walsh wrote: > "Jan Tosovsky" writes: > >> On 2013-12-09 Norman Walsh wrote: >>> >>> ... future work on XSL FO has large

[docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-10 Thread Norman Walsh
"Jan Tosovsky" writes: > On 2013-12-09 Norman Walsh wrote: >> >> ... future work on XSL FO has largely been abandoned. > > Does it mean that XSL-FO 2.0/next is not planned any more? Is there any > citation for this? http://www.w3.org/XML/XPPL/ "This WOrking (sic) Group is no longer active, b

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-10 Thread davep
On 10/12/13 09:41, Frank Arensmeier wrote: 10 dec 2013 kl. 07:59 skrev davep : On 09/12/13 16:09, Norman Walsh wrote: I can see you getting 80% with html and CSS... My penneth says you'll fall over on the 20% so I'm -1 on this. Do you believe you can do it? What of re-ordering, toc etc? Oh,

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-10 Thread Frank Arensmeier
10 dec 2013 kl. 07:59 skrev davep : > On 09/12/13 16:09, Norman Walsh wrote: > >>> I can see you getting 80% with html and CSS... >>> My penneth says you'll fall over on the 20% so I'm -1 on this. >>> Do you believe you can do it? >>> What of re-ordering, toc etc? >> >> Oh, you'd need a "for p

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-09 Thread davep
On 09/12/13 16:09, Norman Walsh wrote: I can see you getting 80% with html and CSS... My penneth says you'll fall over on the 20% so I'm -1 on this. Do you believe you can do it? What of re-ordering, toc etc? Oh, you'd need a "for print" HTML stylesheet. There's lots of things that CSS can'

RE: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-09 Thread Jan Tosovsky
On 2013-12-09 Norman Walsh wrote: > > ... future work on XSL FO has largely been abandoned. Does it mean that XSL-FO 2.0/next is not planned any more? Is there any citation for this? Thanks, Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbo

Re: [docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-09 Thread David Cramer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/09/2013 10:11 AM, Norman Walsh wrote: > You can't cut and paste the verbatim display's now either. In > fact, one reason to go with tables is to make that part work. All > the numbers go in the first column, the lines in the second, so you > can,

[docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-09 Thread Norman Walsh
Bob Stayton writes: > What composition engines do you have in mind for rendering HTML+CSS to print? I've tried both PrinceXML and AntennaHouse with some success. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh | Time i

[docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-09 Thread Norman Walsh
"Jan Tosovsky" writes: > While I don't plan to upgrade my generating workflow to XSL 2.0 stylesheets > in the near future, I am quite curious whether the proposed HTML+CSS > approach can really cover all common needs: > > 1. ToC and Index with page numbers > 2. Bookmarks > 3. Double-sided version

[docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-09 Thread Norman Walsh
David Cramer writes: > One caveat about using tables for line numbers. It generally makes it > impossible to cut and paste the code sample without getting all the line > numbers. One thing I like about the syntax highlighter above is that > when you click on the code sample, the callouts go away a

[docbook-apps] Re: Syntax highlighting

2013-12-09 Thread Norman Walsh
davep writes: > No problem with line numbers. I guess it's the outcome we want > rather than how it is done? > Would that work with insertions too? E.g. lines with (6) etc > which are referred to in commentary? Yes, that should still work. >> As long as I'm airing dirty laundry, I'm also tempt