Re: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-10 Thread Dave Pawson
Processing docbook, using a namespace. The layout.xml file, valid to layout.rng Should the layout.rng be namespaced? I think yes: My reasoning. All the way through the processing, especially chunking, comparisons are made with the xml:id in the actual webpage and the 'id' values in

RE: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-10 Thread Dick Hamilton
Dave, Should the layout.rng be namespaced? I think yes: I agree My reasoning. All the way through the processing, especially chunking, comparisons are made with the xml:id in the actual webpage and the 'id' values in autolayout.xml? 1. This is confusing if one is id and one xml:id

Re: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-09 Thread Dave Pawson
John New wrote: Hi Dave, I'm pretty much a general user of the website DTD. The kind of documents I tried to find a while ago when I put my website together using the website DTD were straightforward examples and how-to guides. Not so much the technical stuff because, generally speaking, I

Re: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-09 Thread John New
] To: John New [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Docbook Apps docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 8:46 PM Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation. John New wrote: Hi Dave, I'm pretty much a general user of the website DTD. The kind of documents I

[docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-08 Thread Dave Pawson
I'm about to start some additional documentation about using and building website. I'm tempted to port the schema to relax / docbook v5 and document it based on that. Any opinions/preferences please? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Re: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-08 Thread Camille Bégnis
Hi Dave, speaking for http://www.neodoc.biz we use V5 for all our new projects since many monthes now, and are now migrating old v4 to v5, since v5 is now (almost?) official :-) Schemas offer greater flexibility (though SGML entities might miss to some) and tools support is great. Finally DTD

Re: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-08 Thread Ron Catterall
relax / docbook v5 is the only way to go. I'm about to start some additional documentation about using and building website. I'm tempted to port the schema to relax / docbook v5 and document it based on that. Any opinions/preferences please? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.

RE: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-08 Thread Dick Hamilton
Dave I'll see if I can check it out - then link it through to the most recent rng schema of docbook 5 that Norm released. Coincidentally, I've been working on pretty much the same thing and have a working, though fragile, attempt at doing exactly this. If you'd like, I can share it with

Re: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-08 Thread Dave Pawson
Ron Catterall wrote: relax / docbook v5 is the only way to go. Thanks Ron, Camil. In my most recent website schema there is a relax NG version. The last change is 2005-04-18 Michael Smith I'll see if I can check it out - then link it through to the most recent rng schema of docbook 5 that

Re: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation.

2008-02-08 Thread John New
to do. Regards, -- John New www.beaglebytes.com - Original Message - From: Dave Pawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Docbook Apps docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:20 PM Subject: [docbook-apps] Website. docbook v5? Documentation. I'm about to start some