Dave Barton wrote:
> Jean Weber wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
>>> Jean Weber wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Milos Sramek wrote:
>
> On 2014-10-03 05:58, Jean Weber wrote:
>> Lastly, if whoever was "cleaning" the files of internal xml problem
Hi :)
Don't worry too much about the page count. It's nice to be roughly right
but doesn't really need to be absolutely precise.
It's just a rough indication of 'size' and a more useful indication of how
much work might be involved in proof-reading (or whichever stage). Mb, Kb
etc didn't really
Jean Weber wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
>> Jean Weber wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Milos Sramek wrote:
On 2014-10-03 05:58, Jean Weber wrote:
> Lastly, if whoever was "cleaning" the files of internal xml problems
> has the time to cle
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Dave Barton wrote:
> Jean Weber wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Milos Sramek wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2014-10-03 05:58, Jean Weber wrote:
Lastly, if whoever was "cleaning" the files of internal xml problems
has the time to clean the WG files, that woul
Jean Weber wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Milos Sramek wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-10-03 05:58, Jean Weber wrote:
>>> Lastly, if whoever was "cleaning" the files of internal xml problems
>>> has the time to clean the WG files, that would be great.
>> I have done my homework :). You can find the
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Milos Sramek wrote:
>
> On 2014-10-03 05:58, Jean Weber wrote:
>> Lastly, if whoever was "cleaning" the files of internal xml problems
>> has the time to clean the WG files, that would be great.
> I have done my homework :). You can find the cleaned version at
> htt
Hello,
On 2014-10-03 05:58, Jean Weber wrote:
> Lastly, if whoever was "cleaning" the files of internal xml problems
> has the time to clean the WG files, that would be great.
I have done my homework :). You can find the cleaned version at
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/hw2khxh567s4bgj/AABWDuKvbAZmIz_
Hi :)
Thanks for the link :) That looks easy and makes sense. I thought it was
at an earlier stage than that. Things move on so fast in LibreOffice!
Thanks and regards from
Tom :)
On 3 October 2014 16:05, Sophie wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> Le 03/10/2014 15:38, Tom Davies a écrit :
> > Hi :)
> > I am s
Hi Tom,
Le 03/10/2014 15:38, Tom Davies a écrit :
> Hi :)
> I am sure it is plenty good enough! The might be minor problems but i
> don't think it's worth trying to catch them now.
>
> Apparently a VERY early pre-pre-release version of branch 4.4.0 is possible
> to acquire from somewhere super-se
Hi :)
I am sure it is plenty good enough! The might be minor problems but i
don't think it's worth trying to catch them now.
Apparently a VERY early pre-pre-release version of branch 4.4.0 is possible
to acquire from somewhere super-secret now. If any more work on the Writer
Guide takes place it
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 13:58:39 +1000
Jean Weber wrote:
> No doubt it features the usual assortment of minor problems that I
> didn't catch, but the ODT and PDF are on the wiki, and the ODT is on
> ODFAuthors. Feel free to report whatever you find.
>
> I'll get it listed on the LibreOffice website s
No doubt it features the usual assortment of minor problems that I
didn't catch, but the ODT and PDF are on the wiki, and the ODT is on
ODFAuthors. Feel free to report whatever you find.
I'll get it listed on the LibreOffice website soon, and get the
printed copy published when I find time (probab
12 matches
Mail list logo
