Hi Milos,
I am still investigating, but I am reasonably sure it is not your script
that is the problem. I may have unintentionally mislead you by referring
to cross-references, the links in your files appear to be correct, but
I am finding errors in the written text for those links which are not
Googlemail wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:17:36 +0200
Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Hi Milos,
Don't be too quick to blame your script, it might not be the cause of
the issue I have encountered. I copied all the files (the originals,
yours and Hazel's corrections) over to another
Dave Barton wrote:
Hi Milos,
I am still investigating, but I am reasonably sure it is not your script
that is the problem. I may have unintentionally mislead you by referring
to cross-references, the links in your files appear to be correct, but
I am finding errors in the written text for
Hi Dave,
Le 22/10/2014 22:05, Dave Barton a écrit :
Hazel Russman wrote:
8-- snip --8
Nothing needs to be redone. All that is needed is to use LO's
built-in merge facility to merge the published version with the two
corrected versions. It will flag up all changes and you can decide
which
Dear Dave,
I am sorry to have caused problems. I've even compared the original and
corrected document, did not see any differences. Since LO does not
compare everything, this may be the reason why I did not notice.
I do not know how did this happen. There is, however, a very simple way
how to
Hi Milos,
Don't be too quick to blame your script, it might not be the cause of
the issue I have encountered. I copied all the files (the originals,
yours and Hazel's corrections) over to another computer with a different
version of Writer and now I am seeing something different. I am starting
to
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:17:36 +0200
Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Hi Milos,
Don't be too quick to blame your script, it might not be the cause of
the issue I have encountered. I copied all the files (the originals,
yours and Hazel's corrections) over to another computer with a different
Hi Dave,
meanwhile I have studied the problem a bit deeper and found out that
update of the table of contents updates the references too.
I've also tested the script - it does not change page numbering (in fact
it cannot do that, it does not enter such tags). Normally, when removing
a large
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:19:04 +0100
Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi :)
Ok, i keep not understanding what's happening.
Was that done to the old version of the chapter before the chaps did all
the work on clearing x-refs and stuff? So are they having to re-do all
their work, or is it
Hazel Russman wrote:
8-- snip --8
Nothing needs to be redone. All that is needed is to use LO's
built-in merge facility to merge the published version with the two
corrected versions. It will flag up all changes and you can decide
which ones to incorporate.
It appears that we have a bigger
Hi :)
Ok, i keep not understanding what's happening.
Was that done to the old version of the chapter before the chaps did all
the work on clearing x-refs and stuff? So are they having to re-do all
their work, or is it just Hazel's work that needs to be re-done?
Is it kinda working? Is the
11 matches
Mail list logo
