Hi :)
That is quite a bit more money than i thought. So, maybe some of that could be
used to reward one or 2 of the authors in some small way.
I think probably better if it's more like a medal, or like the DistroWatch
rewards system (where people kinda vote informally for which project gets
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi :)
That is quite a bit more money than i thought. So, maybe some of that could
be used to reward one or 2 of the authors in some small way.
I think probably better if it's more like a medal, or like the DistroWatch
Hello
I have just uploaded a draft copy of Version 4 of the Getting Started Guide
Chapter 1 Introducing LibreOffice to the ODF Authors website.
http://www.odfauthors.org/libreoffice/english/getting-started/draft-lo-4.0/gs-chap-1-introducing-libreoffice/view
It is ready for review and comment.
Hi Peter
I've just taken a quick look at your chapter and agree that Tango is not
too good an icon set. I've expressed the same opinion to Jean and I hope
the decision will be made to stay with Galaxy.
With regards to the chapter you've just posted, the copyright page
carries the date range
I tested the possible problem with comments created by LO
4.0.0.0.beta2 (32 bit). LO 3.5.7and 3.6.5.2 both opened it with no
problems. Even the Ubuntu version 3.5.4 opened it. One thing that I did
notice is that all of these versions placed the arrow at the beginning
of the range of text
Hello John
I only did this as an experiment. It will be easy enough to change back to
Galaxy if we can get an agreement to continue with Galaxy.
Thanks for the info about the commenting in Writer. I shall watch out for it.
Regards
PeterS
On 23 Jan 2013, at 16:04, John Smith wrote:
Hi Peter
p.110. Bad list numbering: 4) 5) 6) should be 1) 2) 3).
p.116. SeeFigure 113.
p.119 bottom itis
p.129 last Note (on the limitations of hiding sections). Perhaps this
should be a Caution.
p.135. Caution. I think this should be a Note.
p.136. Note should be a Caution.
--
H Russman
--
Hi Dan
My problem exists on LO 4.0.0.1. I only have Windows to check it on and
it causes the error there. The problem, to reiterate, is caused by
selecting a range of text and inserting a comment, as opposed to just
clicking in the text and then inserting a comment. This can be seen
here:
I have installed LO 4.0.0.1 on both 32 bit and 64 bit for Ubuntu 12.04
LTS. I repeated the test (selecting more than 10 words) using 4.0.0.1.
On 32 bit, it opened as before in LO 3.5.7 and 3.6.5.2. On 64 bit, it
opened using LO 3.4.4, 3.5.7, and 3.6.4.3. LO 3.4.4 hung up for a while
possibly
+1 ;-)
Best regards
Leo
Op 23-01-13 22:20, Jean Weber schreef:
OK, since we all dislike the Tango icons, let's keep using Galaxy in the v4.0
user guides for now. That will also save some work in identifying and replacing
icon images.
--Jean
On 24/01/2013, at 1:46, Peter Schofield
Hi :)
Good work Hazel, as always. Errr you meant 3.6 in the subject line tho i
guess. Looks like a deliberate tpyo just to make sure we are awake :)
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Hazel Russman hazeldeb...@googlemail.com
To:
I've done a little more testing on the problem of LO not opening the
documents in which I'd selected text and added comments to it.
It appears to only affect the LO User Guides documents. Perhaps it is
something to do with their origins, or the template. I've no way of knowing.
However, I can
BTW, what is the difference in the LibreOffice View options for icon
styles between the Automatic (Tango) and the Tango listitems?
In addition, it is somewhat confusing to still have Galaxy listed as the
default for the icon style--worded as Galaxy (default)--after the
factory default was
You'll need to talk to the Design Team or the devs about those issues;
they are not in our area of responsibility or ability to change. Nor
do I know the answers to your question.
--Jean
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Gary Schnabl gschn...@swdetroit.com wrote:
BTW, what is the difference in
Very likely, there is no difference between the two of them. One
way to test this is to select Tango and take several screen shots of
the icons. Then select Automatic (Tango) and do the same thing. Then
compare the screen shots.
I have version 4.0.0.1 for 32 bit and 64 bit Debian. (I
On 1/23/2013 11:24 PM, Dan Lewis wrote:
Very likely, there is no difference between the two of them. One way
to test this is to select Tango and take several screen shots of the
icons. Then select Automatic (Tango) and do the same thing. Then
compare the screen shots.
I have version
Hi :)
It is good to hear the differences (if any) are not very noticeable. I think
that's the only bit that is of crucial interest to the Docs Team except perhaps
in one of the guides if there is a paragraph about icon sets. Even there it
probably doesn't matter much unless the different sets
17 matches
Mail list logo
