ink others do to which is why the issue arose.
Less guilt and optimism and more arrogance would have fixed it.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Wed, 22/8/12, Jean Weber wrote:
From: Jean Weber
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco documentation: brainstorming
about the LibreOffice
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:57 PM, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Hazel,
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hazel Russman
> wrote:
>> Well, I am definitely not signing up to Twitter or Facebook. I have
>> better things to to with my time.
>
> Twitter would be just part of a panoply of means of communicat
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:28 PM, David Nelson wrote:
>
> However, IMHO, it would be good to start using Alfresco's blogging
> facilities, maybe it's wiki functionality, and it's automated email
> alerts and RSS feeds.
I agree that if we decide to use Alfresco, we should take advantage of
features
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:23 AM, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Hazel,
>
> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Hazel Russman
> wrote:
>> So how will people know when something needs a review? Or a final
>> edit/proofreading? The traditional way was to put it in a specific
>> folder whose contents could be c
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Cedric Bosdonnat
wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 08:10 +1000, Jean Weber wrote:
>> One annoying thing to me is that I have not seen an easy and
>> convenient way to link directly to a folder or a file in Alfresco, so
>> I can send that link to, say, Ha
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Cedric Bosdonnat
wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 10:21 +1000, Jean Weber wrote:
>> In David's first note on this thread, he asked,
>> > Cedric Bosdonnat, I was wondering if you might give us an idea of the
>> > progress with CMIS support within LibreOf
Hi Jean,
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 08:10 +1000, Jean Weber wrote:
> One annoying thing to me is that I have not seen an easy and
> convenient way to link directly to a folder or a file in Alfresco, so
> I can send that link to, say, Hazel, and say "Here's a file that needs
> editing" or "The files are
Hi Jean,
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 10:21 +1000, Jean Weber wrote:
> In David's first note on this thread, he asked,
> > Cedric Bosdonnat, I was wondering if you might give us an idea of the
> > progress with CMIS support within LibreOffice? I'm curious about this
> > as it could have a big impact on h
In David's first note on this thread, he asked,
> Cedric Bosdonnat, I was wondering if you might give us an idea of the
> progress with CMIS support within LibreOffice? I'm curious about this
> as it could have a big impact on how team workers would interact with
> the Alfresco platform, i.e. via t
On 23/08/2012, at 2:12, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:48 PM, David Nelson wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
>>> Much better to have it on a TDF server.
>>
>> OK, I filed a request with the BoD.
>
> I've just been on the BoD confcall, and dis
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:12:42 +0300
David Nelson wrote:
>
> The only question to be clearly resolved is: does the Documentation
> team really want an Alfresco platform?
>
> If the answer is yes and the only real sticking point is that you want
> it hosted on a TDF server rather than a community
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:48 PM, David Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
>> Much better to have it on a TDF server.
>
> OK, I filed a request with the BoD.
I've just been on the BoD confcall, and discussed the provision of a
TDF server to host the Alfresco pla
Hi Jean,
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
> Much better to have it on a TDF server.
OK, I filed a request with the BoD.
--
David Nelson
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-list
Please wait at least a week so I have time to respond in more detail. Also I
may learn some useful suggestions this weekend at OpenHelp.
Jean
On 08/08/2012, at 0:15, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
>> I think the process we choose should
Much better to have it on a TDF server.
Jean
On 08/08/2012, at 0:15, David Nelson wrote:
> I've IM'ed with Florian Effenberger and he's pretty sure that TDF
> would be willing to provide a server if people preferred to have
> Alfresco hosted on a TDF-owned resource. It might be something to
>
Hi Jean,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
> I think the process we choose should allow for and encourage, but not
> require, the steps or roles of reviewer, proofreader, etc even if we skip
> some steps (as indeed we do) or one person does several steps. I'll write
> more when
Hi Klaus-Jürgen,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
wrote:
> I like the idea of wiki functionality especially for translation. We on
> German doku team tried to translate the documentation by wiki: Having the
> original text in little bit by bit and translating and reviewing/
Hi Hazel,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hazel Russman
wrote:
> Well, I am definitely not signing up to Twitter or Facebook. I have
> better things to to with my time.
Twitter would be just part of a panoply of means of communication -
more "output only". Alerts (about stuff published, resource
guess it's different for
different people.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Tue, 7/8/12, Jean Weber wrote:
From: Jean Weber
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco documentation: brainstorming
about the LibreOffice docs team workflow
To: "documentation@global.libreoffice.org"
I think the process we choose should allow for and encourage, but not require,
the steps or roles of reviewer, proofreader, etc even if we skip some steps (as
indeed we do) or one person does several steps. I'll write more when I'm not on
the phone.
Jean
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
On 07/08/2012, at 4:22, Hazel Russman wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:28:43 +0300
> David Nelson wrote:
>
>> Most of all, I'd definitely recommend revising the file naming
>> conventions and taking advantage of Alfresco's built-in versioning.
>
> +1 to that.
>
Yes. I'm sure I said the file n
Hi David, all,
Am 07.08.2012 11:28, schrieb David Nelson:
[...]
We *really* have a fuzzy, fluid organization.
And we are proud of it. ;-)
[...]
However, IMHO, it would be good to start using Alfresco's blogging
facilities, maybe it's wiki functionality, and it's automated email
alerts and RS
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:28:43 +0300
David Nelson wrote:
> You could also consider Twitter as a good channel for updates, both
> automated and manual. Using Twitter would do away with the need to
> sign-up for and follow a mailing list, and put you closer to potential
> contributors from the huge T
Hi Hazel, Jean, guys,
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Hazel Russman
wrote:
> Reviewing and proofreading are two very different activities. A
> reviewer needs to be knowledgeable about the software being described,
> so that he/she can check the accuracy of every statement made about it.
> A proof
Hazel has covered some of the important points I would have made. I'll
get back with a more detailed reply next week, after discussion with
techwriting colleagues at the OpenHelp Conference this coming weekend.
At this point, I'll address only one point: published ODTs are
essential for translator
Hi Hazel,
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Hazel Russman
wrote:
> So how will people know when something needs a review? Or a final
> edit/proofreading? The traditional way was to put it in a specific
> folder whose contents could be checked up on periodically. If you don't
> do that, it would hav
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 20:42:37 +0300
David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> OK, the workflow we originally set-up on Alfresco is a bit like Snakes
> & Ladders. The doc start in the "Drafts" folder. A considered-ready
> draft gets approved and goes forward to the "Review" folder. A
> reviewer proofreads i
Hi Jean,
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
> BTW, this wiki page includes a diagram of the workflow used by
> ODFAuthors for many years for docs production. The descriptive text is
> a bit out of date (especially info on naming convention) and not
> relevant to Alfresco (again, na
Hi Jean, I'll reply to you mail by mail...
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
> David, I see you have provided the Enterprise edition of two of the
> Alfresco manuals. Aren't we using the Community Edition of Alfresco?
> Are there differences? Or perhaps Alfresco has not updated th
BTW, this wiki page includes a diagram of the workflow used by
ODFAuthors for many years for docs production. The descriptive text is
a bit out of date (especially info on naming convention) and not
relevant to Alfresco (again, naming convention), but the general flow
is one I think should be adapt
David, I see you have provided the Enterprise edition of two of the
Alfresco manuals. Aren't we using the Community Edition of Alfresco?
Are there differences? Or perhaps Alfresco has not updated the
Community Edition manuals?
--Jean
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Jean Weber wrote:
> Ah, I now
Ah, I now see these are PDFs. That helps! --Jean
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jean Weber wrote:
> Hi David,
> Thanks for starting this discussion, even though your timing is unfortunate
> for me. I am travelling, with limited Internet access and only inconvenient
> ways to view ODT files on
Hi David,
Thanks for starting this discussion, even though your timing is unfortunate for
me. I am travelling, with limited Internet access and only inconvenient ways to
view ODT files on my iPad. I may not get a chance to deal with this until
mid-August, but I'll try.
--Jean
On 04/08/2012, a
Hi, Jean, Sanket, guys,
If you have time, I would just like to start a brainstorming about the
docs team workflow, as it is now and how it might be if Alfresco was
the primary working platform.
For this, I have downloaded Alfresco documentation from the Alfresco
project about "generic" use of Alf
34 matches
Mail list logo
