On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Sophie wrote:
> I don't know if it's still true for en_US help, but by the past, the
> *files* contained links to the how-to and to the Calc functions.
By files, do you mean the in program help files?
Olivier
> should have more info about it, but maybe there i
Hi Kenneth,
Le 10/11/2017 à 07:16, Kenneth Hanson a écrit :
> I've gone ahead with option #1: user docs are categorized as
> "Documentation", following precedent. I haven't yet touched the doc dev
> pages.
>
> I've found quite a few orphaned pages (no incoming links), old pages, and
> stubs, which
I've gone ahead with option #1: user docs are categorized as
"Documentation", following precedent. I haven't yet touched the doc dev
pages.
I've found quite a few orphaned pages (no incoming links), old pages, and
stubs, which I've categorized. You can look at the documentation category
page to ge
Hello all.
I'm continuing to work a bit on the wiki, now focusing on organizing user
docs. For a refresher, see what I wrote in August:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:Khanson679/Wiki_cleanup
I haven't gotten much input on this issue, but I'm now leaning against
moving all such pages und
On 16.08.2017 03:20, jonathon wrote:
> On 08/15/2017 09:37 AM, Dave wrote:
>
>> While your interest in the documentation wiki is appreciated, have you
>
> This was a task that sorely needed doing.
True that the documentation section of the wiki was/is in need of some
attention, no more than othe
On 08/15/2017 09:37 AM, Dave wrote:
> While your interest in the documentation wiki is appreciated, have you
This was a task that sorely needed doing.
Furthermore, it is easier to make the desired changes, and revert/modify
later, than try to gain some type of consensus, prior to doing them.
jon
Hi Ken
Em 15/08/2017 08:40, Kenneth Hanson escreveu:
> One more thought. I have sort of been hoping for more input that I've got
> until now. There hasn't been any comment on the issue of user docs / doc
> team pages, as well as several later queries. My progress reports are also
> an implicit cal
One more thought. I have sort of been hoping for more input that I've got
until now. There hasn't been any comment on the issue of user docs / doc
team pages, as well as several later queries. My progress reports are also
an implicit call for feedback. So I'll make it explicit: Any ideas?
--Kennet
Well, my assumption has been that these changes shouldn't be controversial,
but can be reverted if necessary, or corrected by others that know better.
Perhaps it would be better to propose changes in advance, just in case. At
the same time, I'm under a time crunch to finish this during summer
vaca
On 15.08.2017 11:19, Kenneth Hanson wrote:
> Update: I've rewritten Documentation/Development, integrating the contents
> of Documentation/Easy_Hacks (most of which wasn't, in fact, easy hacks) and
> splitting the detailed guides instructions and wish list off into new pages.
>
> I also edited the
Update: I've rewritten Documentation/Development, integrating the contents
of Documentation/Easy_Hacks (most of which wasn't, in fact, easy hacks) and
splitting the detailed guides instructions and wish list off into new pages.
I also edited the guides instructions a bit, but I haven't touched the
Hi Kenneth
Em 05/08/2017 19:26, Kenneth Hanson escreveu:
> Olivier,
>
> Thanks for trying to explain this to me. I'm not certain I understand,
> so I'll try to confirm.
>
> It sounds like there isn't a concrete plan for the content of the
> documentation website, which is why it mostly duplicate
Olivier,
Thanks for trying to explain this to me. I'm not certain I understand, so
I'll try to confirm.
It sounds like there isn't a concrete plan for the content of the
documentation website, which is why it mostly duplicates the download
options on the main website and wiki right now.
But it s
Hi Kenneth
I reviewed the doc entry page and removed some obsolete pages and their
associated links.
Thank you for your help here.
Kind regards
Em 31/07/2017 02:53, Kenneth Hanson escreveu:
> Progress report for July 31.
>
> 1. Moved doc team pages, in particular about the help system, under
>
Hi Kenneth
Em 30/07/2017 11:17, khanson679 escreveu:
> sophi wrote
>> Could you add links to what you're talking about and the duplication you
>> see, it would be easier to help you.
>
> Right. So on the main website doc page
> (http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/documentation) we have: getting
Progress report for July 31.
1. Moved doc team pages, in particular about the help system, under
Documentation. Left user doc pages alone.
2. Updated Documentation/Development intro page.
3. Moved and retitled many pages, updated TOC again.
Let me know if I screwed anything up so far.
New issue:
Progress report on what I did last week.
1. Moved miscellaneous links, mainly wiki pages, which neither seem like
"publications" or "third party" resources, to a new Other Resources page.
Renamed old "Other Documentation and Resources" to "Third party resources.
Updated links and descriptions ever
Talk page is started:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talk:Documentation
Though now that I've done this, I remember how much I dislike wiki-style
talk pages compared to actual threaded conversations. Anyway, take a look.
--Kenneth
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: documentation+unsubscr...@globa
18 matches
Mail list logo
