** PeterMerchant via dorset [2019-03-14 12:13]:
> On 13/03/2019 17:39, Paul Tansom wrote:
> > ** Ralph Corderoy [2019-03-10 14:46]:
> > > Hi Terry,
> > >
> > > > I commented that it was a shame that the Government / BBC hadn't
> > > > chosen the Raspberry Pi, since it already had a strong
On 13/03/2019 17:39, Paul Tansom wrote:
** Ralph Corderoy [2019-03-10 14:46]:
Hi Terry,
I commented that it was a shame that the Government / BBC hadn't
chosen the Raspberry Pi, since it already had a strong community.
I think two things counted against the Pi back then. It's price, though
** Ralph Corderoy [2019-03-10 14:46]:
> Hi Terry,
>
> > I commented that it was a shame that the Government / BBC hadn't
> > chosen the Raspberry Pi, since it already had a strong community.
>
> I think two things counted against the Pi back then. It's price, though
> I haven't checked on what
Hi Terry,
> I commented that it was a shame that the Government / BBC hadn't
> chosen the Raspberry Pi, since it already had a strong community.
I think two things counted against the Pi back then. It's price, though
I haven't checked on what Pi models were available when the decisions
would
On Sunday, 10 March 2019 13:51:19 GMT Keith Edmunds wrote:
> So, er, what's the question?
As Peter said, it came up during the LUG Meeting and I commented that it was a
shame that the Government / BBC hadn't chosen the Raspberry Pi, since it
already had a strong community.
After a fairly
So, er, what's the question?
--
Linux Tips: https://www.tiger-computing.co.uk/category/techtips/
--
Next meeting: BEC, Bournemouth, Tuesday, 2019-04-02 20:00
Check to whom you are replying
Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk/
New thread, don't hijack:
6 matches
Mail list logo